PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Shkabara <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:58:10 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
Thank you David. As I expected, you gave a very nice presentation. You also
got me to investigate the 90.0.0.n range. It does appear the this range is a
myth and not truly reserved. Here is a link I ran into:
http://www.bcmaven.com/networking/myths.htm

If anyone has more info on the 90.0.0.n range, please post. In particular,
how the myth get started, or a reference to where it is reserved would be
nice. If memory serves me, I originally found it in a Ziff-Davis
publication, as well as a few other places, but not a definitive source.

Peter
-----------------------------------------------
The NoSpin Group
[log in to unmask]

> -----Original Message-----
>   The most common private ranges, defined by RFC 1918, are
>
> 10.x.x.x (1 Class A network)
> 172.16.x.x - 172.31.x.x (16 Class B networks)
> 192.168.x.x (256 Class C networks)
>
>   APIPA (169.254.x.x (Class B)) is a special case defined
> elsewhere, as is
> (I believe) 192.0.2.x (Class C).  I'm not sure where, or even
> if, 90.x.x.x
> is defined.
>
> David Gillett (no final e...)

              The NOSPIN Group is now offering Free PC Tech
                     support at our newest website:
                          http://freepctech.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2