PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Donald Gaither <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 19 Aug 1999 09:29:49 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (53 lines)
Hi,
        On Tom's Hardware page (
http://www.tomshardware.com/releases/99q1/990114/cpu-overview-05.html
specifically) Tom states that he saw only a 3.7% performance increase
between a Celeron 400 and a PII 400 (66 MHz and 100 MHz respectively).
 Also, I can't find it now, but I remember reading that for the most part a
PII and a PIII at the same clock speed gave within 1% of the same results.
 Net suggestion, stick with the Celeron.  You will doubtfully see a major
bonus in most use by going with a PIII.

HTH,
Donald Gaither

-----Original Message-----
From:   ferdy [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
Sent:   Saturday, August 14, 1999 11:36 PM
To:     [log in to unmask]
Subject:        Re: [PCBUILD] Celeron

> At 15:19 8/14/1999 , Drew Dunn wrote:
>  >The most significant difference between a PII and a Celeron is that the
>  >level 2 cache on a PII is four times larger than that of a Celeron, so
>  >at a given clock speed a PII will outperform a Celeron on CPU intensive
>  >operations.
>
> But there's another difference! The cache in the PII runs at half
> the CPU's clock speed whereas the cache in the Celeron runs at the
> full speed of the CPU. The Celeron has faster cache!

OK, now here is another question. All that being said about caches and
speeds, what is the performance difference between say, a PII or III at the
same speed as a Celeron, say both in the 400 or 450 range, with the
difference being the 100Mhz FSB vs. 66FSB? Does the FSB speed effect the
performance or are all things equal more or less still?
Reason for the question is, I am about to upgrade my PII233 to probably a
PIII450. From what you two are saying it sounds like I'd get about the same
performance out of a Celeron 466 or 500 with an adapter in my Abit BX6, but
with out the new instructions.  Is this the gist of this? Since a Celeron
is
just a bit cheaper than a PIII 450. Just trying to get educated. Thanks.

Brad Loomis
Los Angeles, CA

                  Visit our website regularly for FAQs,
               articles, how-to's, tech tips and much more
                  http://nospin.com - http://nospin.org

         The PCBUILD web site always needs good submissions.  If
          you would like to contribute to the website, send any
               hardware tech tips or hardware reviews to:
                           [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2