PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Leif Gregory <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - PC Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 14 Mar 1998 10:50:48 +0900
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
At 08:59 AM 3/13/98 +0000, [log in to unmask] wrote:
_________________ Begin Quoted Text _________________
>        Well, this seems to me an extraordinary trick; congratulations to Leif and
>to Gordon.
>        However, I've always seen that OSR2 uses to leave very little conventional
>memory in its DOS sessions (even with the usual tricks), which may be a >problem for some programs or games. It appears to be better in last OSR2 >CD's, but the final reason has always been a mistery to me.
>************************************
>Javier Vizcaino. Ability Electronics. [log in to unmask]
 _________________  End Quoted Text  __________________

Possibly you are talking about very old versions of OSR2 (Win95b), I have version 4.10.1423b (which I got in October of 97) and have sufficient RAM available in both DOS sessions and straight DOS.

DOS window:  611K
Straight DOS : 624K

Using himem and emm386 NOEMS

About the only DOS game I've played that required a huge amount of conventional mem was "The Legacy" which required 610K. There are probably others, but I don't recall ANY that needed 624K, much less more.

See ya!

Leif Gregory
<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2