PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 16 Jan 2001 21:02:13 +1100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
Celeron is powerful enough for normal use. But these days, it's hard to rate
a processor "good" or "bad", it's all depending on what you want to do. eg.
if your primary goal is playing games, Celeron is not for you (at least, not
for hardcore gamer). Power user usually goes high-end PIII, or AMD
Thunderbird. I don't recommend P4 at the moment, unless all your software
take advantage of P4 SSE2 instruction set (nobody knows how long you have to
wait for that), and you are willing to pay the highly overpriced RDRAM.
Without software support, P4 is slower P3!

Jun Qian

----- Original Message -----
From: "Sarah Cloud" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 3:30 PM
Subject: [PCBUILD] Celeron Processor


I am getting a new computer that has an Intel Celeron Processor. Is this a
good, fast processor? Will it be okay to run Windows ME and CD-RW drive?

-Sarah

                         PCBUILD's List Owner's:
                      Bob Wright<[log in to unmask]>
                       Drew Dunn<[log in to unmask]>

                         PCBUILD's List Owner's:
                      Bob Wright<[log in to unmask]>
                       Drew Dunn<[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2