PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Donald Gaither <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 30 Aug 1999 12:32:41 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Hi,
        Yes, though not as important as it used to be.  Setting to 72Hz or higher
tends to be what most people think will cause the least amount of eye
strain and headaches.  I sometimes have to use an old monitor that runs at
60hz and can personally attest to the ergonomic problems of using low
refresh rate.

Donald Gaither

-----Original Message-----
From:   Uzi Paz [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
Sent:   Sunday, August 29, 1999 9:01 AM
To:     [log in to unmask]
Subject:        [PCBUILD] Refresh rates

Would it be correct to say that it is important that the monitor will
support high refresh rates because setting a lower refresh rate will
cause the human eye to become more exhausted from watching the
screen?
In other words, what is the advance of higher refresh rate from the point
of the user?

         PCBUILD maintains hundreds of useful files for download
                     visit our download web page at:
                     http://nospin.com/pc/files.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2