PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Herbert Graf <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 11 Mar 2001 20:57:31 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
>          Now to you're board. Most 486 boards either did not use parity or
> gave you
> >the choice whether to use it or not in the bios. There ARE a few
> boards that
> >have parity check enabled, those will require parity memory. In
> either case
> >with memory the standard recommendation is get more of what you've got.
> >However, if you have non-parity memory adding parity memory
> should NOT pose
> >any problems. The only problem is if the board autodetects
> parity memory, if
> >that's the case simply move the parity memory to another slot until the
> >autodetect mechanism is looking at you're non-parity memory.
>
> I've had a peek into the BIOS and found an option called "Memory Parity
> Check".  Is this the option you speak of?  If so, that means I can disable
> it and do alright with a mixture of Parity & Non Parity?

        Yes, that's the option you're looking for. However I should mention that
although some boards include this option they still might not implement a
parity check if you select it. This obviously isn't relevant in you're case
but I wanted to add it in the case another reader is interested. TTYL

        The NOSPIN Group provides a monthly newsletter with great
       tips, information and ideas: NOSPIN-L, The NOSPIN Magazine
           Visit our web site to signup: http://freepctech.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2