PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Jose E. Dominguez" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 16 Aug 1998 02:21:21 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Jun of course you can play. All I'm saying is don't let Intel dictate that you can not
because you don't have a Pentium chip. Granted that Intel has a faster better FPU than
the AMD, that doesn't mean you can't play. The difference is in milliseconds and can
only be seen in benchmarks which are probably written to favor Intel anyway.

Set up two identical machines at the same speed with a K6 and a PII, run whatever game
you wish and see if with the naked eye you can tell difference. Is said difference
worth anywhere from $300 to $500?

Jose


Jun Qian wrote:

> Jose E. Dominguez wrote:
>
> > > Does that really make a difference if your using a 3D graphics card?  In other
> > > words, does a good 3D game card override the performance loss on a CPU?
> > >
> >
> > A good 3D card makes all the difference in a game. The K6-2 also has special 3D
> > instructions, that the PII does not, that are there to handle all the 3D action.
> >
> > Jose
>
>   until all 3D games are designed to let 3D card do all the 3D actions, we still
> need the FPU for a while.  It's really a matter of games design.  Now, the two most
> important things for games are still FPU and graphics card.  I hope I'm wrong, if
> so, i could play ...
>
> Jun

ATOM RSS1 RSS2