PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ray Parrish <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:14:35 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (66 lines)
Hello,

That's very interesting information. The main reason I see for 
distinguishing between SATA and PATA drives is that they use different 
controller hardware, and very distinctly different cables, so they 
cannot really be lumped together as being the same.

I'm still used to the older terminology which used to always refer to 
PATA drives as IDE, and will try to remember to update my references to 
PATA from now on.

System Information still refers to my PATA drives interface on the 
motherboard as an IDE interface, and since I have no SATA interface and 
never have had, I have no idea what it's motherboard interface is 
referred to as for comparison.

Later, Ray Parrish

Hugh Vandervoort wrote:
> There's not enough confusion about this subject, so here's some more.
> I'm running a single drive on my ASUS RAID controller. This is designated as
> Promise 1 + 0 Stripe and it came about when my RAID  setup died and I wanted
> to use a single disk on that controller. One of these days I'll figure out
> why it's called RAID when it's a single disk.
> On another point, both SATA and PATA are IDE.
> Wikipedia:
> "The term *Integrated Drive Electronics* (IDE) refers not just to the
> connector and interface definition, but also to the fact that the drive
> controller <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drive_controller> is integrated
> into the drive, as opposed to a separate controller on or connected to the
> motherboard <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motherboard>."<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Technology_Attachment#cite_note-3>
>
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 3:07 AM, Ray Parrish <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>   
>> The RAID card was mistake. It's designed for using pairs or more of hard
>> drives to write data to in a fashion that either stripes the data onto the
>> drives to spread the file load around simulating a larger drive on the two
>> of them, or write the data to both of them together, to create a redundant
>> file system with the data duplicated on both drives.
>>
>> Either way you need at least two drives to mount a RAID file system. I'm
>> not even sure if you can hook up a single drive to a RAID controller and get
>> it to work by itself. You should have looked for a plain SATA drive
>> controller card. I've never actually had a RAID  setup myself 'though, so I
>> suppose it might be possible to forego installing the RAID drivers, and just
>> use the card as a SATA drive controller only, and it might work that way.
>>
>>     
>
>                          PCBUILD's List Owners:
>                       Bob Wright<[log in to unmask]>
>                         Mark Rode<[log in to unmask]>
>
>   

-- 
Human reviewed index of links about the computer
http://www.rayslinks.com
Poetry from the mind of a Schizophrenic
http://www.writingsoftheschizophrenic.com/

              The NOSPIN Group is now offering Free PC Tech
                     support at our newest website:
                          http://freepctech.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2