PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: W-3's
From:
Hans Kylberg <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 22 Dec 1999 22:15:08 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines) 
At 21:09 1999-12-21 -0500, Todd wrote:

>Now if you want a really high w6:w3 ratio, try pork, "composite
>cuts".  The ratio is about 29:1.  But Oscar Mayer ham has one of
>the best ratios, with *more* w3 than w6.

I suspect that there is something wrong with all these figures.
What if they have not measured it correctly, perhaps due to small
total amounts, or made estimations or whatever?

- Hans

ATOM RSS1 RSS2