Philip wrote:

> As you probably figure, I am in pretty fair agreement with the
> "anti-aerobics" FAQ
>
>     http://www.superslow.com/why_not_aerobics.html
>
> but I mean by "low-impact" aerobics something like a moderately
> brisk walk.
>
From  http://www.superslow.com/why_not_aerobics.html:

> According to Dr. Cooper, further research has shown that there is no correlation between aerobic
> endurance performance and health, longevity, or protection against heart-disease. He will admit, however, that such activities
> do carry with them a great risk of injury. Further, he admits that gross-overuse activities such as running may be so damaging to
> the body as to be considered carcinogenic.
>
Dang Philip--you're such a spoil sport!  Buttered toast and chocolate
cake are distant history for me :-(  Does this mean I have to cut down
on sex now too?! ;-)

Lois