PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Carrie Coineandubh <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 12 Jan 2008 13:28:06 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
> Date:    Sat, 12 Jan 2008 11:53:03 -0700
> From:    steve <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: raising animals and the environment

> I find the idea irrational that somehow "humans" are not a component of
> "nature" including all the ways we adapt our environment  and that for
> example, when beavers build dams and modify their environment, that's
> natural, but when humans build dams and modify their environment, that
> is somehow  "unnatural."  Refusing to adapt one's environment, that
> truly is unnatural.

*** Humans absolutely are a natural part of the environment. The question is 
whether or not humans are evolutionarily "fit." Individuals/species that are 
"fit" survive by fitting into a niche in the web of life and thriving there. 
If we change the environment to the point where we can no longer survive, 
that would be perfectly "natural" and humans as a species would become 
extinct, as millions of species have already done. It doesn't take a species 
with big smarts to change the planetary environment to the point where it 
can no longer survive, either. Cyanobacteria did it 2 million years ago.

--Carrie 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2