PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ken Stuart <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 29 Apr 2003 17:54:08 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
On Tue, 29 Apr 2003 19:00:00 EDT, Holly Krahe <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>In a message dated 04/29/2003 5:22:00 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
>[log in to unmask] writes:
>
>> Since when do oranges have anything to do with berries??  Are they related??
>>
>
>Well, technically, any fruit with internal seeds (and no core) is a berry.
>Oranges (and other citrus) are a special berry called hesperidium.  Tomatoes
>are berries, too, as are cucumbers and the like.
>
>I don't believe they are closely related, nor do I think the antioxidant
>level of all "technical berries" is as high as the ones we commonly think of
>as berries.

That is correct - oranges have less than those that have "-berries" in the
name.


--
Cheers,

Ken
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2