PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Susan Kline <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 19 May 1999 16:57:55 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
>> Optimal foraging theory pretty much rules out the use of things like grains
>> in all but the leanest of times.

I believe that there's a big difference between flax seed and grains.
Grains are inedible raw, and when dried are hard. They have a lot of
starch and are low in oil.

Flax seed is excellent uncooked, easily gathered, and is rich with a
good oil. It gives a good return in calories compared to unimproved
grains. Ever seen teff? Almost as fine as dust. Yet in Ethiopia it's
considered a food crop.

When unimproved grains fall to the ground it's a drawback, especially
since they're so small. Flax stays in the seed casing, where it can be
found easily. Also, flax provides a good fiber for cordage.

Most of these questions can never be answered, but it's easy to imagine
our distant hunter-gatherer forbears liking flax. It also grows in
northern climates, and tolerates heavy wet ground, which is why it used
to be a major crop in Oregon, before the synthetics replaced linen.

Susan Kline

ATOM RSS1 RSS2