PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Brandt <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 14 Apr 2003 22:16:57 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (55 lines)
Jay:
 >For One, Paul Bragg wrote the book, "The Miracle of Fasting."
 >Paul Bragg died in his early to  mid-nineties...

Because he wrote a book on fasting I am sure. :)

 >IN A WATER SKIING AND/OR SURFBOARD ACCIDENT.

It is well-known that fasting enthusiasts make the worst skiers
and surfers. :)

 >Interestingly,  Jack Lalanne was a student of Paul Bragg.

I find it more interesting that Jack's older brother, who is still
going strong, is not into health.

 >Whether it was James Calab Jackson, MD, of Dansville,
 >NY's "Home on the Hill" spa, or the much better known
 >John Harvey Kellogg, MD of Battle Creek and cereal fame,
 >these quacks were neither fleecing nor killing their
 >patients.

Well, it was not for a lack of trying.  I understand that
Kellogg's low-fat regime based largely on various
concoction from grains was enough to break the spirit
of the strongest of men. :)

 >It is easy for Hollywood to put together a fictional film
 >(bordering on the >libelous) such as The Road to Wellsville,
 >which makes a mockery of Dr. Harvey Kellogg.

I cannot imagine why.  :)

 >All these women were quacks, of course, because they
 >advocated fasting,  water cures, sunlight, exercise and good diet.
 >You will learn of them in  detail in The Greatest Health Discovery,
  >by the American Natural Hygiene Society.

If a credible organization such as the ANHS says so, it surely
must be true.  :)

 >Of course, it's in the name itself. "Quack" is a condemnatory
 >word. Even eye-witnessed murderers are called "suspects"
 >well into the legal process.  "Quacks," by definition, cannot be
 >good. Even witches, a familiar childhood symbol of evil, are cut
 >more slack: "Are you a good witch, or a bad witch?"  Dorothy was
 >asked. No one has ever asked me, "Are you a good quack, or a
 >bad quack?"

It only weakens your position when you use examples of quackery
in mainstream medicine to defend and justify fringe quacks like
Fry and (by inference) Bernarr.

Peter

ATOM RSS1 RSS2