PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Robert Kesterson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 15 Jan 2006 16:53:13 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (48 lines)
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 15:09:05 -0600, Ashley Moran  
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Jan 15, 2006, at 1:17 pm, Robert Kesterson wrote:
>> On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 05:22:45 -0600, Debby Padilla-Hudson  
>> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Do you feel that small frequent meals is an important
>>> factor in weight loss?
>>
>> I do.  ...
>
> I used to think this too, but I read something that made me think  
> otherwise.  ...this new-fangled "warrior diet" (eating only in the  
> evenings during a 4-hour time period).  It was hardly paleo, as it  
> basically condensed a standard western day's food into a few hours.  So  
> you'd have cornflakes at 6pm, sandwiches at 7, steak and chips and ice  
> cream at 8 and a cake at 10, or something like that.  Surprisingly they  
> found that on average, the test subjects lost weight.

Probably because they were starving.  If you don't eat all day, your body  
is going to be catabolic, burning itself (fat and/or muscle protein) for  
fuel.  Then when the evening comes, trying to stuff a whole day's worth of  
food into your belly is just going to make you disgusted and not want to  
eat nearly as much as you ordinarily would.
I guess it comes under the heading of "whatever works", but personally I  
wouldn't want to eat that way.

> I eat like this anyway, and I find it convenient as I only spend about  
> 1.5 hours a day preparing and eating food, and I tend to eat less too.

I spent under an hour making all my meals for the day (6 of them).  I  
don't know how much time I spend eating them (it's not really important,  
as I am fortunate to be able to eat while I work if I want to, and the  
evening mealtime is "family around the table" time, so I don't care how  
long it takes.

> But the main short-term benefit of that is saving money, as I haven't  
> got any extra weight to lose.  Also I plan to live to 120 and every  
> little helps :)

Indeed, health and longevity are the main reasons for going paleo.  If I  
wanted to live a short life, I'd feast on pizza and snack on wine and  
cheese.  ;-)

-- 
   Robert Kesterson
   [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2