Amadeus:
 >>>I tend to think so too, but it's always a question of amounts.
 >>>Without nets and fishhooks and in dry areas the amounts would have been
 >>>very low, I think.

Peter:
 >>Does this mean that you are now willing to concede the same point when
 >>it comes to plant foods? ;-)

Amadeus:
 >Yes. The same thing of course applies to the amounts of particular plants
 >which later became a staple. Legumes, cereals.

This applies not only to legumes and cereals but to all edible plants
"individually" as well as plant foods as a category which is why, no matter
  what virtues a diet like the one you are eating might have, is way off the
charts in terms of its relevance to paleo.

Amadeus:
 >http://www.naturalhub.com/natural_food_guide_meat.htm
 >Now only 4 animals are staple and they are even very much
 >modified by agrigulture. Previousls... read yourself.

Which is an argument not to reduce intake of animal foods but to expand
variety and to seek out quality of these foods.

Peter