Richard,

Your comments on a person named Zephyr's book and everything that follows
them are truly baffling.  Firstly, there has been no mention of this book on
this list since December, and even then it was very scant.  That in itself
is not so strange - perhaps you want to share a new book with the list that
you think relates to the list's topic.  However, after the first few
sentences on Zephyr, you embark on a lengthy moral and religious commentary
that, aside from two (2) sentances that seem to be forced into the text
solely for the purpose of maintaining on-topicness, has nothing to do with
the subject of this list.  Furthermore, having not personally read or even
heard of this Zephyr book, I find your arguments against it hard to follow.

I really don't mean to be harsh, but I think that most of us here would
agree that religeons, especially those that occur only during the last 2000
years (and origeonated in the vicinity of the first agricultural
settlements, no less), have little to do with the topic of replicating
paleolithic eating patterns in a modern world.  Exceptions might be
questions as to whether or not certain religious food are "paleo," or how
did paleolithic art and religeon influence dietary patterns.

Respectfully,

B. Lischer