PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 7 Aug 2000 08:56:39 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (42 lines)
Okay, I've missed a post or two....  Was there a url pointing to this
research?  Would be ecstatic for anyone to reiterate this....  Thanks,  :)
Oliva

----- Original Message -----

From: "Wally Day"
> > Subject: Re: SFAs and EFAs
> >
> > On Sat, 5 Aug 2000 07:55:22 -0400, Todd Moody
> > <[log in to unmask]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > [very nice research]
> > >This supports the dietary
> > >principle that fat and carbohydrate intake should
> > be inversely
> > >proportional to each other.  If this principle is
> > adhered to, I
> > >doubt that SFAs present a problem.
> >
> > Bingo -- thanks for the research you did supporting
> > this
> > principle.
>
> Which also supports the idea that some folks do better
> on higher carb/lower fat diets, and some folks do
> better on higher fat/lower carb diets. (So long as
> protein remains "reasonably" high - IMO). I suspect
> that some folks will actually do better ehwn they
> "cycle" these two modes of dieting.
>
> > Dave,
> >
> > You win.
> >
> > Enjoy,
> > Kirt
>
> WOW!
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2