PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Todd Moody <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 15:20:38 -0400
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (22 lines)
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Amadeus Schmidt wrote:

> The real difference is availability.
> Wrangham's tubers would be much easier and more reliable to "hunt" than
> gazelles, I suppose. So that's the argument what's left.

I think that would depend on many factors: location, season, etc.
Remember that tubers are an entire class of plant foods, while
gazelles are only a single type of game animal.  When the hunters
don't get a gazelle, they can try for a boar, a turtle, a duck, a
crab, and so forth.

> How did you like my venus of Willendorf as a paleo-DHA-attractiveness
> demonstration?

I leave it to you to present the argument -- that men like big
boobs because they symbolize big brains -- to the academic
community.  I think it's an idea whose time has come.

Todd Moody
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2