Tracy Bradley wrote:
> william wrote:
>> The higher nutrient content of raw fat meat satisfies because it is as 
>> close as we can get to the perfect food.
>> Eating to excess, as in the same meat cooked, results in malnutrition.
>> This has been demonstrated by those brave enough and/or desperate 
>> enough to try eating raw zero carb.
>>
>> William
>>
> William...can you back this up? How on earth does eating cooked meat 
> result in malnutrition? What do you mean by cooked...well done, medium, 
> etc?

Cooked meat lacks the nutrients of raw, so we eat more of it until full. 
The full signal is probably because stomach is full, not because of 
satisfaction.
I think it is malnutrition because I don't feel good after eating 
cooked. If there is a credible study on this I am not aware of it, so 
must use my own experience.
By cooked, I mean heated high enough to destroy nutrients, ~120°F
according to Rooker.


  Stef and Andersen, in their Bellevue experiment, ate med-well done
> meat and suffered no malnutrition after one year, so perhaps you can 
> qualify what exactly it is you mean, or provide a source?
> 
>

No source, but consider: to what did they compare their state of health?
A year of eating all raw would have given them a point of reference; I 
don't know that they ever did that.

William