PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
bruce sherrod <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 1 Nov 2005 15:01:59 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
Thanks David, that was precisely the kind of article I was looking for.
I thought have thought to check beyondveg.com first!

A vegan friend lent me the book, and while I'm by no means an expert
at statistics, I spotted several things in the first few pages that
felt suspicious.

-- Bruce

David H writes:
>The China Study is vegan propaganda. There are so many misleading points in
>it that I would label it as intellectually dishonest. A good dissection is
>at http://www.beyondveg.com/billings-t/comp-anat/comp-anat-8e.shtml
>
>David
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Date:    Tue, 1 Nov 2005 11:25:56 -0800
>From:    bruce sherrod <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: The China Study
>
>Has anyone read this book, "The China Study"? (
>http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1932100385/104-5968150-3053501?v=glance&n=283155&n=507846&s=b
>ooks&v=glance).
>
>Are there discussions/refutations anywhere?   The research claims to
>show the lower protein intake causes lower rates of many diseases,
>including cancer.
>
>------------------------------
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2