PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mark Labbee <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 11 May 2001 19:31:37 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
My copy of The Glucose Revolution shows rutabagas to have a glycemic index
of 72 on the glucose = 100 scale while white potatoes can range from 63 when
boiled to 85 when baked. Interesting that sweet potatoes have a glycemic
index of 54 when boiled.

Mark



So I guess turnips and rutabagas are way ahead of potatoes in terms of
fiber/CHO ratio, and total CHO content by weight. But what I don't
understand is that if you look at a glycemic index it's a different
story. On the white bread index, white potato is 80, and rutabaga is
103! I didn't see turnips listed.

Hilary McClure
Danville, VT

ATOM RSS1 RSS2