PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 3 Jun 2009 18:18:32 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
Day, Wally wrote:
> Subject: Re: Early cooking
> 
>> Can any dog owners confirm that dogs prefer cooked meat to raw?
> 
>> My dog prefers whatever she thinks I'm eating.  Raw, cooked,
>> animal, vegetable, doesn't matter.
> 
> Yeah, I had to chuckle a bit when I read the question. I think dogs
> prefer... just about anything they can get away with :)
> 


Irrelevant, isn't it? How many people are willing to eat raw, for
instance. Looks like dogs copy us. Monkey see, monkey do becomes doggy
see doggy want.

   There are several raw pet lists, all of them have glowing reports of
the improvement in health when pet's diets are changed to totally raw.

What I found interesting on a rawcat list was the agreed diet for cats
was something like 80% meat, 10% innards, 10% bone. Yes, bone. OK, I
thought, they are different in that they have shearing teeth like
kitchen shears on the side of their jaws.
So cats are different, but the bone still puzzles me, as this would
balance acidity, and we moderns also need to do that. Wonder if paleoman
needed bone?


William

ATOM RSS1 RSS2