INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ado Hall <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
INTERLNG: Discussiones in Interlingua
Date:
Tue, 16 Nov 2004 22:18:49 +1100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
jo ha scribite:

> 1. Australopithecinae
> 2. Homo habilis
> 3. Homo erectus
> 4. Homo sapiens
>
> 1) Tote le specie de Australopithecus es simias extinte simile a illos
> contemporanee.
> 2) Le antropologa american Holly Smith in 1994 dice: "Circumscribente le
> analisis del fossiles a celle exemplares que satisface le criterios, le
> modellos de developpamento dental del australopithecinae e de Homo
> Habilis remane classificate como simias african"
> 3) Non existe necun differentia inter le skeleto de un homine modene e
> le Homo erectus (vide le pigmeos, le aborigenes australian, per exemplo)

Tu  poterea explicar le puncto 3) un pauc plus? Il pare que tu vide un
similaritate inter le cranio de  un Homo Erectus e cello de un aborigine
australian. Io ha comprendite ben?

Edo

ATOM RSS1 RSS2