Paul Gideon Dann skrev 2014-02-18
15:49:
> On Tuesday 18 Feb 2014 15:11:24 Ruud Harmsen wrote:
>> Yes, but then the _perfect_ tenses express the _non-perfect_ (not
>> completed, continuous) aspect! That is extremely confusing for
> me
>> (also because in Dutch, we don't necessarily use our perfecto
>> composto that way).
> Memora que il ha un differentia importante inter un *tempore
> perfecto* e le *aspecto perfective*:
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_aspect
Certo, pro isto on ora in nostre
svedese grammatica parla de
"preterito" e non como antea de
"imperfecto", quia on pote
facilmente creder que imperfecto
tracta del aspecto, pro exemplo in
linguas slave.

Kjell r


--
Pro leger le archivos e pro modificar o cancellar le subscription:
http://listserv.icors.org/archives/interlng.html