INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Allan Kiviaho <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
INTERLNG: Discussiones in Interlingua
Date:
Thu, 17 Feb 2000 21:30:45 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (44 lines)
d[000217] x[Allan Kiviaho] KivA-02G
s["Vamos?"]

Courier o Courier New 10 (longor fixate) necesse est!

Adrian Neilson Hall:
Io pote vider le justification pro le inclusion del sequentes:
'io so' ab 'suis' 'soy' 'sono'
------------------------------------------------------
Allan Kiviaho 000217: sum = io so -proque- um = o

Adrian:
Sed 'nos vamos' ab 'allons' 'andiamo' e 'vamos' es obviemente
unico espaniol (e portugese), nonne? Secondo me, le titulo
'Vamos introducer Interlingua' pare un pauc... hmmm 'ridiculo'.
Commentos?
------------------------------------------------------
Allan: In latino: Vadere, vadimus ...

In le IED:
[vamos] (vá) pr 1me pers pl of vader
          I. (we) go, are going;
         II. let's go, let us go;
        III. [Grammatical functions:
             1. auxiliary, forming the future or
                immediate future;
             2. auxiliary, forming the imperative];
        vamos comenciar
             1. we shall begin, are going to begin
             2. let's begin, let us begin

Adrian, quare pensa tu que "vamos ..." pare ridiculo?

Interlingua - vamos comenciar
Anglese     - let's begin
Germano     - lasset uns beginnen
Swedese     - låt oss börja
Finnese     - aloittakaamme (comenciar = aloittaa)


Salutante

Allan

ATOM RSS1 RSS2