INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steinar Midtskogen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
INTERLNG: Discussiones in Interlingua
Date:
Fri, 7 Nov 1997 12:53:40 GMT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
[Chris Burd]

> Concernante altere formatas "aperte", io opine que PostScript es plus tosto
> un cosa pro le computatoristas experte. RTF serea dunque un melior
> selection, si un formata "ric" es necesse. (Illo es un formata "aperte" ex
> Microsoft que conserva quasi tote le formatatura de un documento Word, ma
> pote esser legite per previe versiones de Word e per multe programmas
> non-Microsoft.)

Si, io crede que RTF es melior que Postscript.  On debe usar
Postscript solmente quando il es necesse que omne formatatura de Word
es preservata.

--
Steinar

ATOM RSS1 RSS2