INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
INTERLNG: Discussiones in Interlingua
Date:
Sun, 3 Feb 2002 12:31:38 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
STAN MULAIK wrote:

> Denis,
>   Ensjo ha ration.  Le IED non es un sacre Coran.  Illo es solmente
> le registration de formas prototypic appoiate per al minus tres
> variantes in le linguas de controlo, con le sensos commun a al minus
> tres linguas de controlo.  On non pote cambiar le linguas de controlo.
> E de tempore in tempore nos discoperi errores in le IED, mais isto
> solmente rarmente.

Como io ha scribite in multe casos antea, le IED se monstra
surprendentemente accurate. On pote questionar isto o illo, ma in le fin
on debe conceder ration al solutiones del IED, al minus in le majoritate
del casos!

Cellus

ATOM RSS1 RSS2