INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Emerson S Costa <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
INTERLNG: Discussiones in Interlingua
Date:
Thu, 17 Jun 1999 08:53:50 -0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
Chris scribeva:
>A martedi, 16 Jun 1999 14:35:14 -0400, STAN MULAIK <[log in to unmask]>
>scribeva:
>
>>Chris notava le suffixo -ada que pote esser un sustenite activitate:
>>
>>"destructada"?
>
>Plustosto "destruada" (-ada non prende themas secundari).

Non... Le suffixo "-ada" es applicate a substantivos o verbos in "-ar", lo que
non es le caso de "destruer".

Uno pote considerar destruer > destructe > *destructar > *destructada. O forsan
destruer > destruction > *destructionada, ma iste parolas _non_ esserea
immediatemente comprendite per un brasiliano con le senso intendite. Un
expression analytic (con 2 o plus parolas) pare esser le melior option hic.

Ensjo.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2