INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Chris Burd <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
INTERLNG: Discussiones in Interlingua
Date:
Fri, 9 Jun 2000 13:10:22 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (40 lines)
On Thu, 8 Jun 2000 22:29:43 -0400, STAN MULAIK <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

>
>Io suppone que le regula debe esser:
>
>Si le adjectivo fini in -ie, alora forma -ietate
>Si le adjectivo fini in -ee, alora forma -eitate.

Io lo formularea assi:

(1) Si et le radice se termina et le suffixo se initia in un vocal, lasser
cader le vocal terminal del radice.

e.g., importante + issime > importantissime

(2) Si Regula 1 produce le combination -ii-, isto se reduce a -i- simple.

e.g., scientia + ista > *scientiista > scientista

Iste duo regulas jam existe in le grammatica de Gode e Blair (ben que non
in iste exacte forma).

Illos indica le sequente formas:

socio + itate > *sociitate > *socitate
spontanee + itate > spontaneitate

Assi, "spontaneitate" es jam in ordine. Lo que on forsan besonia es un
regula pro producer "societate", per exemplo:

(3) Si le adjectivo fini in -i(e), alora forma -ietate

Isto es le tue on un addition minime. Cetero, on es libere de
reguardar "societate" etc. como formas legeremente irregular.

Amicalmente,

Chris

ATOM RSS1 RSS2