INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
INTERLNG: Discussiones in Interlingua
Date:
Wed, 6 Feb 2002 12:03:18 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Mario Malaguti wrote:

> >Le mesme principio rege ci. In general on debe lassar un camera al
> >mediedie, a
> >vices a un tempore anterior. Ma on sempre conta le tempore de locar un
> >camera in
> >noctes!
> >
> >Cellus
>
> Tu ha ration! Per quante noctes? Per tres noctes! Per solmente iste nocte!
>
> Correcto? Uhm? Correcto o correcte? = (es illo) correcte?!
>
> Mario

Le grammatica de G&B ha _Claro._ In le nota al paragrapho 47. Vos crede ist? -
Claro!

In iste construction omne adjectivos que pote assumer le desinentias -o e -a
pote haber iste forma.

Cellus

ATOM RSS1 RSS2