INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pawel Wimmer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Tue, 7 Dec 2004 17:35:53 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: INTERLNG: Discussiones in Interlingua
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Stanley Mulaik
> Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 3:45 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [INTERLNG] IED e Wiktionarios
>
>
> Con respecto al IED, illo es ja in le dominio public.
> Possibilemente il es solmente juste si on indica que on ha
> revisionate lo, e qui le redactor o autor de tal revisiones
> es.  Io va facer isto in le futuro.
...
>
> Stan Mulaik
>

Le proprietate principal del Wikitionario, e generalmente Wikipedias, es
collaboration de multe personas e actualisation de materiales. Si le IED es
in le dominio public, on poterea divider lo in parve partes, pro
convenientia, e disveloppar lo succesivemente pro eventual edtiones futur in
papiro, mesmo commercial (!!!) - solo le anglophonos poterea facer lo,
naturalmente. Un modello excellente es Interlingua-Nederlandese.
Tal es le senso de tote Wikis (Wikipedias e altere communitates que es
centos in le mundo, basate sur c. 40 motores, non solo MediaWiki) -
sapientia libere, disponibile a omnes.
Altere arguibile dictionarios on pote remover o proteger - salvo
Interlingua-Polonese :-)
Pawel

ATOM RSS1 RSS2