The Gaza crisis and the perspective of permanent revolution
30 December 2008

The onslaught against Gaza has provoked popular outrage throughout the
Middle East and around the world, even as governments in the Arab world
and elsewhere have lined up to provide justifications for this US-
Israeli war crime.

Israel's declaration of "all-out war" against a largely defenseless and
half-starved population of 1.5 million people imprisoned in a blockaded
strip of land justifiably provokes fury and revulsion. So too do the
hypocritical and lying reports of the mass media, which incessantly
describe Israel's aerial blitz against apartment blocks, police
stations, universities, mosques and office buildings as an act of "self
defense," while equating the occupied with the occupiers and
ineffectual homemade rockets with US-supplied F-16s, Hellfire missiles
and "smart bombs."

Yet moral outrage and condemnation of Israel are by no means a
sufficient answer to the atrocities in Gaza. What is required above all
is a political perspective.

Many of those now under attack are the children of refugees subjected
to violence and forced from their homes by Israel in its expansionary
war of 1967. Then, as now, the plight of the Palestinians was largely
ignored by the world's governments, while their interests were betrayed
by Arab bourgeois nationalist regimes that claimed to speak in their
name.

As the terrible events have unfolded in Gaza over the past three days,
it has become clear that the present-day Arab bourgeois governments are
either acting as direct accomplices in the attack on the Palestinians
or offering their tacit political support.

The most criminal role has been played by the US-backed police state
regime of Hosni Mubarak in Egypt. Egypt had collaborated with Israel in
enforcing its punishing economic blockade of Gaza by closing the Rafah
crossing between Gaza and Egypt. After the bombing started, terrified
Palestinians trying to flee across the Egyptian border to safety were
met with Egyptian machine gun fire.

It is widely suspected that the Cairo regime deliberately deceived the
Hamas leadership in Gaza, assuring them just hours before the bombing
began that Israel had no intention of launching an attack. Hamas
representatives have insisted that it was this Egyptian assurance that
led to buildings not being evacuated, resulting in a higher toll of
killed and maimed.

The London-based Arabic-language newspaper al-Quds al Arabi cited Arab
diplomatic sources as reporting that Egyptian Intelligence Minister
Omar Suleiman warned a number of Arab leaders that Israel was preparing
just such an attack on Gaza.

Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit told a press conference
Saturday that Hamas was responsible for the violence against Gaza.
"Egypt warned for a long time and someone who ignores warnings is
responsible for the outcome," he said.

Newspapers close to the Saudi monarchy essentially welcomed the Israeli
onslaught, describing it as an attack on "Iran's agents" in the Middle
East.

Representatives of the Palestinian Authority in Ramallah led by
President Mahmoud Abbas have told the Israeli media that they likewise
viewed the massacre in Gaza as an opportunity to regain power, assuring
the Zionist establishment that they are prepared to move in if Israel
succeeds in toppling the Hamas administration with high explosives.

Even those regimes that have formally denounced the attacks and
criticized other Arab governments for their complicity?such as Iran and
Libya?do so from the standpoint of advancing their own regional and
bourgeois political interests.

In a fitting symbol of the reaction of the Arab regimes as a whole, an
"emergency summit" of Arab League foreign ministers was postponed until
Wednesday, giving Israel five full days of bombing before it confronts
another toothless declaration.

And, while it is necessary to defend Hamas against the ongoing
assassination of its leaders and the unending vilification of its
supporters as "terrorists" by those inflicting massive state terror
against a civilian population, this Islamist movement has no real
perspective for confronting and defeating the US-Israeli offensive.

The firing of rockets into southern Israel was aimed at convincing
Israel to negotiate a lifting of economic sanctions, just as its talk
of renewed "martyr operations," sending young Palestinians to blow
themselves up in Israeli cafes and buses, is similarly designed to
pressure the Zionist regime.

No one has benefited more from the domination of nationalism and
Islamism in the Arab countries than the Zionist regime itself. There is
no nationalist way out of the present morass.

Creating another national mini-state in the region will not provide a
solution to the decades-old dispossession of the Palestinians. The
division of the West Bank and Gaza by Israeli settlements, security
roads, checkpoints and walls make it clear that such a territory could
represent only a Bantustan-type prison, with a Palestinian bourgeois
nationalist regime serving as its guards.

Israeli officials have made it clear that they see the so-called "peace
process" as a means of creating just such a monstrosity, dubbed the
"two-state solution," in order to lay the political foundations for
expelling Israel's own million-strong Arab population, a massive
exercise in ethnic cleansing.

This maniacal perspective, like the attack on Gaza itself, is a
manifestation of the political bankruptcy and crisis of Zionism. The
Israeli state and all of its major parties are subordinate to a
military camarilla. The regime staggers from one reckless military
adventure to another?from Lebanon to Gaza and, on the horizon, to Iran?
inflicting destruction on civilian populations while horrifying and
demoralizing large sections of Israel's own people.

While the government seeks to maintain its power by constantly
promoting both fear and chauvinism, there are many Israelis who view
the unfolding violence with revulsion and the conviction that it can
lead only to new disasters.

Ultimately, the aggressive militarism of the Israeli state is an
expression not merely of Zionist ideology, but of deep-going social,
political and class fissures that run through Israeli society. It is a
society characterized by vast social inequality and a regime headed by
an individual, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, whose narrow escape from
criminal indictment for financial and political corruption expresses
the corrosion of the entire Zionist establishment.

In one revealing comment, Olmert's spokesman, Mark Regev, declared
after a government meeting following the first round of bombings in
Gaza: "In the cabinet room today there was an energy, a feeling that
after so long of showing restraint we had finally acted." That the
slaughter of innocents by means of aerial bombardment is a source of
renewed political "energy" speaks volumes about the nature of this
regime.

A genuine struggle against Zionism is conceivable only on the basis of
a class struggle that transcends national boundaries, uniting Arab and
Jewish workers based upon their common class interests. Outside of a
class perspective, which seeks the independent and united mobilization
of both Arab and Israeli workers, there is no real means of dealing a
deathblow to Zionism and imperialism in the Middle East.

The demonstrations that have erupted from Cairo to Baghdad in support
of Gaza have been directed not just against Israel, but against the
rotten Arab regimes, which represent Israel's most faithful allies.
This popular movement is not just a reaction to the latest events, but
rather part of a growing radicalization of the working class in the
Middle East as well as in Europe, America and across the globe, driven
by the desperate crisis of world capitalism.

For all of the heroism of the Palestinians facing Israeli F-16s and
Apache helicopters in Gaza, the greatest threat to the Zionist regime,
its Achilles heel, is the intensification of class struggle and the
prospect of socialist revolution in Egypt, the other Arab states and in
Israel itself.

A genuine revolutionary alternative can be constructed only on the
basis of the theory of permanent revolution, as developed by Leon
Trotsky. In the imperialist epoch, Trotsky established, realization of
the basic democratic and national tasks in the oppressed nations?tasks
associated in a previous historical period with the rise of the
bourgeoisie?can be achieved only through the independent political
mobilization of the working class acting on a socialist and
internationalist perspective.

The Palestinian question, the center of the bitter conflicts and
political tragedy of the region is, in the final analysis, bound
inseparably with the fate of the socialist revolution in the Middle
East and internationally. The unfolding events in Gaza pose with the
greatest urgency the struggle to unite the working class, Arab and
Jewish alike, in the fight for a socialist federation of the Middle
East as part of the struggle to put an end to capitalism on a world
scale.

Bill Van Auken

¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤