ECHURCH-USA Archives

The Electronic Church

ECHURCH-USA@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jenifer Gilley <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Electronic Church <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:29:04 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (160 lines)
thanks john for asking... beat me to it!  *smile*
Jenifer gilley 
check out my blog
http://claudastar.blogspot.com/
AIM: jenibear1998
msn 
[log in to unmask]
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Schwery" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 9:06 AM
Subject: Re: The Tabernacle Courtyard


> April, where are these from?  These are good.
> 
> earlier, April Stahl, wrote:
>>The Tabernacle Courtyard
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>"You shall make the court of the Tabernacle"
>>
>>(Exodus 27:9a NASB)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Thus we have the Tabernacle in three divisions,
>>
>>symbolic in itself.
>>
>>
>>
>>No, not for 'Father, Son, and Holy Ghost'.  But
>>
>>just because it was divided ...something which
>>
>>isn't the case in NT churches.
>>
>>
>>
>>Christ being the Mediator and ecclesiastical Head
>>
>>in both the New Testament and the Old.
>>
>>
>>
>>And, He is represented in each of the chambers
>>
>>of the OT Tabernacle.
>>
>>
>>
>>Just that the Savior is more directly visible in the
>>
>>current dispensation than the last dispensation.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>The courtyard (and Tabernacle as a whole) was
>>
>>fenced. We've previously discussed the significance
>>
>>of this not being un-walled and open.
>>
>>
>>
>>[ Greek temples as early as the 7th. Century B.C.
>>
>>had open colonnades for their perimeter.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>That would've been a great convenience over a full
>>
>>fence for the men who had to move the Tabernacle
>>
>>from place to place.  But the Tabernacle was not
>>
>>something which could be entered from any direction ! ]
>>
>>
>>
>>The Tabernacle had only one way to get inside (v. 16).
>>
>>And you really couldn't even look in from outside.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>The fencing was 150-feet long by 75-feet wide. [ We
>>
>>assume here an ancient cubit equals 18-inches. ]
>>
>>
>>
>>So, the place wasn't huge.  Out of all the masses of
>>
>>Israel, it could accommodate only a few.
>>
>>
>>
>>( Matthew 22:14 comes to mind. )
>>
>>
>>
>>The fencing and the size bespeak exclusitivity.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Not that the Tabernacle was restricted to ethnic
>>
>>Jews only.
>>
>>
>>
>>Leviticus 17:8-9 indicates that geyr (literally "guests";
>>
>>NASB, NRSV, "aliens"; NKJ, WEB, ESV "strangers";
>>
>>CSB "foreigners") could also present sacrifices there.
>>
>>
>>
>>Just not do-yourself-religion.  Numbers 15:14-16
>>
>>making this very plain: "an alien or anyone else
>>
>>...must do exactly as you do" (NIV).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Skype Name:  april_r
>>MSN: No e-mail please:  [log in to unmask]
>>AIM: No e-mail please:  [log in to unmask]
>>Yahoo Messenger No e-mail please:  [log in to unmask]
>>"God is still on the throne!"
>>April and Miss Flurrie
>>
> 
> John
> 
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2