CLOAKS-AND-DAGGERS Archives

April 2001

CLOAKS-AND-DAGGERS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steven Aftergood <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Cloaks-and-Daggers Open Discussion of Intelligence (Academic)
Date:
Wed, 4 Apr 2001 13:11:21 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (122 lines)
SECRECY NEWS
from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy
April 4, 2001

**      OVERSIGHT OF THE DANIEL KING CASE
**      PROTECTING INTELLIGENCE ON US AIRCRAFT
**      MOYNIHAN'S ROLE IN THE MORISON PARDON


OVERSIGHT OF THE DANIEL KING CASE

Yesterday the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence held a closed hearing
to consider the case of Daniel M. King, a Navy officer who was accused of
espionage, held for 520 days, and then released last month when the Navy
was unable to substantiate the charges against him.

"What happened to Petty Officer King is alien and antithetical to our
system," said Jonathan Turley, King's civilian attorney, in a lengthy
prepared statement submitted to the Committee.

Among numerous government abuses alleged by the defense team in its
testimony, the handling of King's indeterminate polygraph examination
stands out.  "A routine 'no opinion' glitch on a polygraph was allowed to
mutate into an espionage investigation from the very first day," said Turley.

A blow by blow account of the repeated polygraph sessions was provided in a
statement by JAG attorney Lt. Matthew Sidney Freedus, a member of King's
defense. Told that he had failed the polygraph test, "King admitted that he
had occasional fantasies about espionage over his 20-year career, but
stated unequivocally that these were just fantasies and that he would never
do anything to hurt the Navy."

"It should be noted that it is very common for individuals working in the
national security field to have fantasies of committing espionage,"
according to Lt. Freedus.

"In fact, during an interview several months later, [the polygrapher who
examined King] acknowledged that fantasies of espionage were common and
even admitted that he had thoughts of espionage."

"It is deeply troubling to me that the Navy has never issued a formal
apology to CTR1 King and his family for this colossal miscarriage of
justice and that no government officials have been held accountable,"
Freedus concluded.

Rather inexplicably, "the Navy congratulated the prosecutor in this case
and awarded her the prestigious Meritorious Service Medal."

Testimony that provides the government's view of the case is
classified.  None of the government statements from yesterday's closed
Senate Intelligence Committee hearing can be released, a Committee
spokeswoman said.

But the statements of the three defense attorneys are presented here:

        http://www.fas.org/irp/ops/ci/king/index.html#ssci

A press release issued yesterday by the King defense, including a
relatively concise Fact Sheet presenting its perspective on the case, is
posted here:

        http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/2001/04/turley.html


PROTECTING INTELLIGENCE ON US AIRCRAFT

The protection of classified intelligence information in an airborne
Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) is governed by Director
of Central Intelligence Directive 1/21, Annex C, Part II:

"If an aircraft landing in unfriendly territory is anticipated, all SCI
[i.e., "Sensitive Compartmented Information"] material will be immediately
destroyed, with the destruction process preferably taking place prior to
landing."

See:

        http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/dcid1-21.htm#air


MOYNIHAN'S ROLE IN THE MORISON PARDON

In 1985, Samuel L. Morison became the first and only person ever convicted
of "leaking" classified information to the press.  On January 20, 2001
President Clinton granted a pardon to Mr. Morison, making it significantly
less likely that anyone else will ever be prosecuted for a similar crime.

One of the influential figures who intervened in support of Mr. Morison's
application for a pardon was Senator Daniel P. Moynihan.  In 1998, Senator
Moynihan wrote to the President noting that "The selective action against
Mr. Morison appears capricious at best."

"What is remarkable is not the crime, but that he is the only one convicted
of an activity which has become a routine aspect of government life:
leaking information to the press in order to bring pressure to bear on a
policy question," Moynihan wrote.

Senator Moynihan's September 29, 1998 letter, recently released by the
Justice Department in response to a FOIA request, is posted here:

        http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/2001/04/moynihan.html

Mr. Morison's successful pardon application was also supported by historian
Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr. and two others.

******************************
To subscribe to Secrecy News, send email to <[log in to unmask]> with this
command in the body of the message:
        subscribe secrecy_news [your email address]
To unsubscribe, send email to <[log in to unmask]> with this command in the
body of the message:
        unsubscribe secrecy_news [your email address]
Secrecy News is archived at:
        http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/index.html

___________________
Steven Aftergood
Project on Government Secrecy
Federation of American Scientists
http://www.fas.org/sgp/index.html
Email:  [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2