frank scott validates Chomsky's model:
> Carkner wrote:
> > what is the point of all these accusations?  no one on this list has a
> > duty to talk about everything that goes on in the world.  yes, the
> > bombings are of equal importance, but you don't have the right to
> > accuse someone of not caring about it just because they don't talk
> > about it on a mailing list.
>
> Amen! Awomen! By the way, is anyone who hasn't posted here concerning
> their outrage over the conditions in american ghettos a racist? Or
> classist? Thanks Dan, and others who don't confine activism to social
> typing, and one-upping other typists.

Yes, thanks Dan, and Frank too, for demonstrating the Chomsky model in
action.

But to answer your question, no, failing to express outrage doesn't
make you a racist.  But you aren't outraged.  You are uncomfortable.
If you were outraged, you wouldn't tolerate the conditions in American
ghettos.

martin