THREATS TO USE NUCLEAR WEAPONS:
This is Google's cache of
scienceforpeace.sa.utoronto.ca/WorkingGroupsPage/NucWeaponsPage/Documents/Th
reatsNucWea.html.
Google's cache is the snapshot that we took of the page as we crawled the
web.
The page may have changed since that time. Click here for the current page
without highlighting.


Google is not affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for
its content.
These search terms have been highlighted: threats use nuclear weapons




















THREATS TO USE NUCLEAR WEAPONS:
The Sixteen Known Nuclear Crises of the Cold War, 1946-1985
by David R. Morgan
National President, Veterans Against Nuclear Arms
Vancouver, Canada
March 6, 1996

Download the PDF File
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION *
PERIOD 1 1945-49: U.S. NUCLEAR WEAPON MONOPOLY *
Nuclear Crisis # 1 YEAR: 1946 NAME OF CRISIS: IRAN I (Azerbaijan) *
Nuclear Crisis # 2 YEAR: 1946 NAME OF CRISIS: YUGOSLAVIA *
Nuclear Crisis # 3 YEAR: 1948 NAME OF CRISIS: BERLIN I *
PERIOD 2. 1949-1962: NUKE THEM FIRST *
Nuclear Crisis # 4 Year: 1950 NAME OF CRISIS: KOREAN *
Nuclear Crisis # 5 YEAR: 1954 NAME OF CRISIS: VIETNAM I (Dien Bien Phu) *
Nuclear Crisis # 6: 1954 NAME OF CRISIS: CHINA I (Quemoy and Matsu) *
Nuclear Crisis # 7 YEAR: 1956 NAME OF CRISIS: SUEZ *
Nuclear Crisis # 8 YEAR: 1958 NAME OF CRISIS: CHINA II (Quemoy and Matsu) *
Nuclear Crisis # 9 YEAR: 1959 NAME OF CRISIS: BERLIN II *
Nuclear Crisis # 10 YEAR: 1961 NAME OF CRISIS: BERLIN III *
Nuclear Crisis # 11 YEAR: 1962 NAME OF CRISIS: CUBA *
PERIOD 3 1962-1969 SCARED STRAIGHT *
PERIOD 4 1969-1985 RELENTLESS ARMS RACE *
Nuclear Crisis # 12 YEAR: 1969 NAME OF CRISIS: VIETNAM II *
Nuclear Crisis # 13 YEAR: 1970 NAME OF CRISIS: JORDAN *
Nuclear Crisis # 14 YEAR: 1973 NAME OF CRISIS: ISRAEL (Yom Kippur) *
Nuclear Crisis # 15 YEAR: 1980 NAME OF CRISIS: IRAN II *
Nuclear Crisis # 16 YEAR: 1983 NAME OF CRISIS: FIRST STRIKE THREATENED USE
OF N-WEAPONS BY: U.S.A. *
PERIOD 5 1985-1991 GORBACHEV ENDS THE COLD WAR *
-PERIOD 6 1991- POST COLD WAR RE-GROUPING *
SOURCES *
APPENDIX: *
Subject: Cold War N-Crisis #16: FIRST STRIKE *
INTRODUCTION

During the 39 years of the Cold War, the United States of America led the
nuclear arms race, repeatedly threatened to use nuclear weapons, and brought
civilization to the brink of destruction on several occasions. This is an
appalling record, but there is no reason to believe that any other great
power having the same advantages as the U.S.A. would have acted any better.
The human race is ill-equipped to deal with nuclear weapons.
The Cold War and the Soviet nuclear threat to the U.S.A. was ended by
Mikhail Gorbachev. It is now widely believed, however, that the U.S.A. "won
the Cold War." The very dangerous crises of the Cold War, their threats
distorted by propaganda at the time, are now almost totally forgotten. The
role of the military establishment that led us into these crises remains
unquestioned, its prestige untarnished. The public remains in ignorance.
This paper is an attempt to inform the public simply and clearly about the
very dangerous nuclear crises of the Cold War. Until these are widely
understood, the great dangers of present policies will not be questioned and
discussed. The U.S.A., with its Freedom of Information Act, is the least
secretive of all the world's great powers. Much of the information in this
summary has been made available by the benefit of this Act. Members of the
public are thus enabled to inform themselves of the way that nuclear weapons
have threatened world security. There are 36,000 nuclear weapons in the
world in 1996 and the threat of the destruction of civilization by these
weapons remains very great. The more that nuclear weapons increase military
power, the more they decrease national security. The only escape from this
paradox is by the balanced reduction and eventual total abolition of these
weapons on a rigid schedule. This is a matter of great urgency; the present
lull in great power rivalry may not last long.
Nuclear
STRATEGIC WEAPONS of Crisis Threat by U.S.A. U.S.S.R.
Table I Nuclear Crises 1946-1985
Crisis Year Length Country
#1 IRAN I 1946 one day U.S.A. 40 0
#2 YUGOSLAVIA 1946 one day U.S.A. 40 0
#3 BERLIN I 1948 15 months U.S.A. 120 0
#4 KOREA 1950 36 months U.S.A. 400 ?
#5 VIETNAM I 1954 3 months U.S.A. 1200 ?
#6 CHINA I 1954 8 months U.S.A. 1200 ?
#7 SUEZ 1956 7 days USSR-USA 2100 60
#8 CHINA II 1958 2 months U.S.A. 3000 110
#9 BERLIN II 1959 4 months U.S.A. 3200 175
#10 BERLIN III 1961 4 months U.S.A. 3600 240
#11 CUBA 1962 2 weeks USSR-USA 3900 300
#12 VIETNAM II 1969 3 months U.S.A. 4000 1400
#13 JORDAN 1970 2 weeks U.S.A. 4000 1800
#14 ISRAEL 1973 19 days U.S.A. 6800 2200
#15 IRAN II 1980 6 months U.S.A. 10312 6846
#16 FIRST STRIKE 1983 24 months U.S.A. N-Winter threat
Total: 107 months of crisis
SUMMARY During the 39 years (or 468 months) 1946-1985, there was: a) A
serious threat of nuclear weapons use for 107 months (23% of time); b) A
serious threat of nuclear war that would destroy most of U.S.A., U.S.S.R.
and Europe during these major crises: VIETNAM I, CHINA I, SUEZ, CHINA II,
BERLIN II, BERLIN III, CUBA, VIETNAM II, IRAN II and FIRST STRIKE, a total
of 55 months (12% of time); c) A serious threat of the extinction of much of
life on the globe from the effects of Nuclear Winter during all major crises
after BERLIN II, March 1959: a total of 38.5 months (8% of time).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table II Nuclear Crises of the Cold War
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PERIOD 1 1945-49: U.S. NUCLEAR WEAPON MONOPOLY
1945 WW-II ends with A-Bombing of Hiroshima (6 Aug) and Nagasaki (9 Aug) -
1946 Iran I and Yugoslavia Crises #1 and #2 -
1948-49 Berlin I Crisis #3 -
1949 Soviets explode A-bomb (Sep) and China goes communist
PERIOD 2 1949-62: NUKE THEM BEFORE THEY CAN NUKE US
1950 Korean War Crisis #4: strong pressure on President Truman (and later-on
President Eisenhower in 1954) to use the A-Bomb -
1953 U.S.A. tests the first H-Bomb (31 Oct) -
1954 Vietnam I Crisis #5; U.S.S.R tests H-Bomb -
1955 China I Crisis #6 -
1956 Suez Crisis #7 -
1957 U.S.S.R. launches Sputnik, the first satellite (4 Oct) -
1958 China II Crisis #8 -
1959 Berlin II Crisis #9
1960 U.S.A. launches the first Polaris nuclear submarine -
1961 Berlin III Crisis #10 -
1962 Cuba Crisis #11
PERIOD 3 1962-69: SCARED STRAIGHT -
1963 Test Ban Treaty (4 Aug ); Kennedy assassinated (22 Nov) -
1964 Khruschev ousted (15 Oct); China tests A-Bomb (16 Oct) -
1967 China tests H-Bomb (17 Jun) -
1968 Tet offensive in Vietnam (31 Jan)
PERIOD 4 1969-83: RELENTLESS ARMS RACE -
1969 Vietnam II Crisis #12 (Aug-Oct) -
1970 Jordan Crisis #13; U.S.A. MIRVs land-based ICBMs (multiple warheads) -
1971 U.S.A. MIRVs its submarine-launched Ballistic Missiles-
1972 last U.S. combat troops leave Vietnam (11 Aug) -
1973 Israel Crisis #13(Yom Kippur); Soviets first MIRV an ICBM -
1974 India tests A-bomb -
1975 fall of Saigon to the communists (29 Apr) -
1976 secret funding of SDI (Star Wars) begins -
1979 U.S.S.R. invades Afghanistan (Dec) -
1979 Shah of Iran flees (16 Jan) and U.S. Embassy seized (4 Nov) -
1980 Iran II Crisis #15, President Carter sanctions First Strike (PD59)
Reagan launches the biggest arms drive in history: $1.6 trillion- -
1982 Swedish Academy Report says that a massive nuclear war will cause a
Nuclear Winter, thus threatening life on the whole earth. -
PERIOD 5 1985-91: GORBACHEV ENDS THE COLD WAR 1985 -
1986 "Year of Peace"; nuclear-tests: U.S.A. fifteen, U.S.S.R. zero -
1987 Secretary Gorbachev and Pres. Reagan sign INF Treaty (8 Dec) -
1988 Gorbachev allows Polish Elections (June) -
1989 Gorbachev allows demolition of Berlin Wall (9 Nov)1990 -
1991 U.S.A. launches "Desert Storm" (17 Jan); Gorbachev ousted (19 Aug);
Yeltsin and leaders of Ukraine and White Russia meet and abolish the
U.S.S.R. (8 Dec) PERIOD 6
1991-: POST-COLD-WAR REGROUPINGS
Similar to PERIOD 3 (Scared Straight); effective nuclear arms control needed
or PERIOD 4 (Relentless Arms Race) may repeat with dire results.
--------------------------------------------------------- ------------------
-
PERIOD 1 1945-49: U.S. NUCLEAR WEAPON MONOPOLY

1945 was a pivotal year in world history: - May: WW-II ended with the defeat
of Germany mainly by the U.S.S.R., U.S.A. and the U.K. - 16 Jul: First
atomic test explosion, - 6 Aug: Hiroshima destroyed by an atomic bomb. - 9
Aug: Nagasaki destroyed by an atomic bomb. The U.S.A. had thus rapidly shown
that it was prepared to use this new ultra-destructive weapon, with its
lingering poisonous effects, in the same way as conventional weapons.
President Truman believed that the Soviet Union would never be able to make
an atomic bomb. He did not hesitate to use the threat of the U.S. atomic
bomb against the Soviet Union. The first such threats came only ten months
after the end of WW-II, in disputes over the Soviet-Iranian border area
(Crisis # 1, IRAN I) and the Balkans (Crisis #2, YUGOSLAVIA I). Crisis # 3,
BERLIN I, was much more serious and lasted for 15 months.
The terminal event of this period came on 3 September 1949 , when the
Soviets exploded their first atomic bomb. The U.S. monopoly of nuclear
weapons had lasted barely four years.

Nuclear Crisis # 1 YEAR: 1946 NAME OF CRISIS: IRAN I (Azerbaijan)
THREATENED USE OF N-WEAPONS BY: U.S.A. TARGET OF WEAPONS: U.S.S.R. CRISIS
STARTS: Mar 1946 CRISIS ENDS: 48 hours after Truman's ultimatum THREAT OF
NUCLEAR ATTACK: Stated AT ISSUE IN CRISIS: British pre-war domination of
Iran was challenged after the war by the Soviets.
BACKGROUND:
During WW-II there was a U.S.A. and Soviet wartime agreement to occupy Iran
jointly. This denied it to the Germans and allowed aid convoys to enter the
U.S.S.R. through Iran. After WW-II, the Soviets demanded oil concessions
equal to those of the British, as previously agreed. To enforce this claim
Soviet troops remained in northern Iran and supported a revolutionary
movement in Azerbaijan Province adjoining Soviet territor y.The Soviets
moved tanks to the border and showed no sign of removing their troops from
Iran by 2 March 1946 as agreed by them at the London Conference of the
Council of Foreign Ministers. CRISIS: President Truman meets personally with
Soviet Ambassador Gromyko and delivers an ultimatum: Remove Soviet troops in
48 hours or the U.S.A. will drop the atomic bomb. "We're going to drop it on
you," Truman is reported to say to Gromyko. OUTCOME: Soviets removed their
troops in 24 hours. This threat of an A-bo mbattack on the Soviet Union by
Truman came only 10 months after the end of WW-II. Three months after this
crisis, on 14 June 1946, the U.S.A. presented the Baruch Plan for the
international control of nuclear material for the production of atomic
energy. Soviet rejection of this plan must now be viewed in the light of
their experience of U.S.A. "atomic control" in the IRAN I crisis over
Azerbaijan.

Nuclear Crisis # 2 YEAR: 1946 NAME OF CRISIS: YUGOSLAVIA
THREATENED USE OF N-WEAPO NS BY: U.S.A.TARGET OF WEAPONS: Yugoslavia? CRISIS
STARTS:Nov 1946 CRISIS ENDS: Nov 1946 THREAT OF NUCLEAR ATTACK: Implied AT
ISSUE IN CRISIS: 1) U.S. military aircraft shot down over Yugoslavia; 2)
U.S.A. right to over-flyYugoslavia; 3) Greece, a strategic base in the
Balkans.
BACKGROUND:
During WW-II, left-wing guerrilla groups in Yugoslavia and Greecewere the
most active in fighting the German occupation and received British support.
Yugoslavia was the only European country to free itself from the German
invaders without help, and emerged from WW-II, as an independent, communist
state. Neighbouring Hungary, Roumania and Bulgaria were freed by the Red
Army from German occupation and then became communist states under Soviet
control. In neighbouring Greece to the south, however, a civil war raged
from 1945-1949 in which the left-wing ELAS guerrillas were opposed by
right-wing Greek groups. With the German army gone, the British switched
their support and, until they withdew in early 1947, helped these right-wing
groups. The U.S.A. replaced the British and provided major military aid to
the Greek right- wing forces in an increasingly severe civil war. Yugoslavia
gave aid to ELAS forces and was considered hostile to U.S. interests, as the
U.S.A. became increasingly involved in the Greek civil war. CRISIS EVENTS:
1946 November: A U.S. military aircraft is shot down overYugoslavia. Six
B-29s are deployed to Germany and then flown across the Yugoslav border, in
a show of force. OUTCOME: No more U.S. military aircraft were shot down over
Yugoslavia.

Nuclear Crisis # 3 YEAR: 1948 NAME OF CRISIS: BERLIN I
THREATENED USE OF N-WEAPONS BY: U.S.A. TARGET OF WEAPONS: 24 Soviet cities
(Operation BROILER) CRISIS STARTS: 24 Jun 1948, Berlin blockaded CRISIS
ENDS: 30 Sep 1949, access rest oredDURATION: 15 months THREAT OF NUCLEAR
ATTACK: Stated AT ISSUE IN CRISIS: Control of Berlin, Germany and Europe
BACKGROUND:
1945, 2 May: Red Army took Berlin, losing 100,000 men. - 7 May: Germany
surrendered. The Red Army met the American and British armies 100 miles west
of Berlin along the Elbe, as agreed. Soviets allowed U.S., British and
French forces to share control of Berlin, also as agreed. Total Soviet WW-II
losses: 26 million, or one out of every 7 Russians. Total American losses:
292,000, or one out of every 513 Americans. Destruction in U.S.S.R.: 17,000
towns, 70,000 villages, 31,000 factories, 84,000 schools, 40,000 miles of
railroad track. Destruction in U.S.A.: nil. Soviet aims after WW-II were: 1)
neutralization of Germany; 2) a "wall" of friendly states on the U.S.S.R.
western frontier; 3) to recover and rebuild. The Soviets built their "wall"
by imposing harsh communist governments on Poland, Hungary, Roumania,
Bulgaria, Latv ia, Lithuania and Estonia. A steady breakdown of relations
between the U.S.S.R and the Western powers then followed. 1946, March: IRAN
I Crisis #1, when Truman first threatened to use A-bomb. - 5 Mar: Churchill
first spoke of the "Iron Curtain" in Fulton Missouri.
- Sep: Elections in Berlin showed no support for Soviets in West sectors.
1947, 12 Mar: Truman Doctrine of U.S. Military support for West Europe. - 5
Jun: Marshall Plan for U.S. Economic support of West Europe. 1948, Feb:
communist coup in C zechoslovakia so that, in Central Europe, only the
status of Germany was still undecided. CRISIS EVENTS: 1948, 24 Jun: Russians
cut land access to Berlin. - Jul: Emergency airlift to West Berlin by the
U.S.A. and U.K. begins - 28 Jul: Forrestal (Secretary of Navy), George
Marshall (Secretary of State) and Omar Bradley (Army Chief of Staff) meet to
decide if Operation BROILER should be executed in response to the Berlin
blockade. - 9 Sep: Forrestal asks British Admiral Sir Frederick Dalrym ple
about British willingness to see the bomb used. - 10 Sep: Forrestall asks
Marshall to give authority to use the A-bomb to commanders in the field.
This meeting concludes with the production of NSC 30, which gives the
President alone power to order an A-bomb attack. - 13 Oct: Joint Chiefs of
Staff (JCS) send a top secret memorandum to the National Security Council
(NSC) demanding to know whether the U.S.A. should launch atomic war on the
U.S.S.R. - 14 Oct: JCS and NSC meet but JCS fail to get permission to launch
war.1949, 30 Sep: access to Berlin restored and airlift and crisis ends.
OUTCOME: In September 1949 the Soviets tested their first atomic bomb, so
this was the last crisis in which the U.S.A. had a monopoly of N-weapons. In
October China became communist with the victory of Mao Tse-Tung. Also in
October, the "Admirals' Revolt" with Admirals Ostie, Burke and Denfield
testifying to the House Armed Services Committee that an atomic blitz is
"morally wrong." was quelled by Truman fi ring Denfield, a warning to
allU.S. officers that open criticism of nuclear policy meant dismissal. The
division of Berlin and Germany hardened for the duration of the Cold War.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

PERIOD 2. 1949-1962: NUKE THEM FIRST

The detonation of the first Soviet atomic bomb on 3 September 1949 was a
great shock to the U.S. leadership in Washington, who had expected at least
a ten-year lead. This was followed almost immediately, in October 1949,
bythe victory of Mao Tsetung's communist forces in China. If China's
neighbours Indonesia and India also became communist, most of the world's
population would then be in the communist camp. These were major strategic
setbacks for Washington and NSC 68 (14 April 1950) was the policy response
by the U.S. National Security Council. It called for: a) containment of the
socialist bloc (U.S.S.R. and China) by a 6,000 mile chain of nuclear bases,
extending from Europe, through the Middle East and South- East Asia to Japan
and Alaska; b) massive re-armament, building theHydrogen bomb, stockpiling
A-bombs and building a long-range bomber fleet. "The date the Soviets
possess an atomic stockpile of 200 bombs would be a critical date for the
United States." (NSC 68). This anticipated date was 1954. The nuclear arms
race was now launched. Presidents Truman and Eisenhower came under very
heavy pressure in the National Security Council, especially from the Joint
Chiefs of Staff, to launch nuclear war against Chi na and the U.S.S.R.,
especially during the Korean War and after theU.S.S.R. exploded its first
Hydrogen bomb on 12 August 1953. The eight nuclear crises, starting with the
Korean Crisis in 1950 and culminating with the Cuban crisis in 1962, make
this thirteen years the second most dangerous period in human history. The
most dangerous period happened during the First Strike Crisis #16 when
nuclear stockpiles and destructive potentials were enormously greater.

Nuclear Crisis # 4 Year: 1950 NAME OF CRISIS: KOREAN
THREATENED USE OF N-WEAPONS BY: U.S.A. TARGET OF WEAPONS: North Korea, China
and U.S.S.R. CRISIS STARTS: Jun 1950, North Korea invades South Korea CRISIS
ENDS: Jul 1953 Armistice at Panmunjon. DURATION: 3 years THREAT OF NUCLEAR
ATTACK: Truman, "There has always been consideration of its use.";
Eisenhower, "To keep the attack from becoming costly, it was clear we would
have to use atomic weapons." The War Plan was OperationSHAKEDOWN, with plans
6 days after the start of WW-III for: bombers from Maine to drop 20 A-bombs
in the Moscow-Gorki area; bombers from Labrador to drop 12 A-bombs in the
Leningrad area; bombers from U.K. to drop 52 A-bombs in the Volga and Donets
Basin; bombers from the Azores to drop 15 A-bombs in the Caucasus area.
bombers from Guam to drop 15 A-bombs in Vladivostock and Irkutsk areas. AT
ISSUE IN CRISIS: threat to South Korea by North Korea backed by the new
Chine se Communist Chinese power in the area.
BACKGROUND:
1949, Sep: the communists, under Mao Tse-Tung, won control of China. - Oct:
Soviets tested their first A-bomb. There was soon great pressure within the
U.S. leadership to destroy the Soviet Union before it gained nuclear
equality. Whether China, now under communist control, was to be a priority
for atomic destruction was a hotly contested issue among the JCS and the NSC
as the Korean war ran its course. CRISIS EVENTS: 1950, June: North Korea
inva des South Korea. U.N. Security Council(Soviets absent) sends U.N.
forces to South Korea. U.N. retreat to Pusan. - 15 Sep: Inchon landings by
U.S.A., traps the North Korean army. - 7 Oct: U.S. troops cross the
38th-parallel into North Korea. - 10 Oct: China warns that it will enter the
war if U.N. forces advance further into North Korea. - 24 Nov: Chinese
arrive at U.N. to negotiate; U.S.A. begins a big offensive the same day. -
28 Nov: Rear-Admiral Lalor asks JCS for permission to us e A-bomb to
discourage intervention by China and thus allow U.N. forces to leave. - 6
Dec: Chinese army attacks and rapidly drives U.N.-U.S. forces from North
Korea. 1951, 11 Jan: Symington (chair of NSC) presents NSC-100 calling for a
surprise atomic attack on China with an ultimatum to U.S.S.R. to avoid any
"aggressive" moves. - 1 Feb: NSC meeting calls for preparations for total
war. - 10 Apr: Truman fires General McArthur for his insubordinate demands
for i mmediate attacks on Chinese bases.- 20 Apr: McArthur given hero's
welcome in New York. - 14 Aug: JCS prepare study of use of the new MK.IX and
W-19 tactical atomic weapons in Korea. These could be used without depleting
the SHAKEDOWN stockpile for Europe. 1952 Nov: Eisenhower elected
President. - 31 Oct: U.S.A. tests the first Hydrogen Bomb. 1953, 11 Feb:
Eisenhower at NSC meeting says, "We should consider the tactical use of
atomic weapons in the Kaesong area."(Korea) - 19 May: JCS calls for a major
offensive that will expand the war effort outside Korea and include use of
N-weapons. - 20 May: JCS present their plans to the NSC. Eisenhower is
finally persuaded to use N-weapons in Korea if negotiations fail. - Jul:
Armistice at Panmunjon ends the Korean War, - 27 Nov: At a meeting with
French Prime Minister Laniel and British Prime Minister Churchill, President
Eisenhower find both strongly opposed to use of nuclear weapons in Korea if
war breaks out again. OUTCOM E: South Korea was secured, with the U.S.A.
committed to defend it andmaintain large forces there, which are in South
Korea up to present.

Nuclear Crisis # 5 YEAR: 1954 NAME OF CRISIS: VIETNAM I (Dien Bien Phu)
THREATENED USE OF N-WEAPONS BY: U.S.A. TARGET OF WEAPONS: Vietnam; later,
China and U.S.S.R. CRISIS STARTS: 8 Mar 1954 (3000 French surrounded at DBP)
CRISIS ENDS: 19 Jun 1954 DURATION: 3 months THREAT OF NUCLEAR ATTACK:
Implied; U.S. nuclear-armed navy carrier force nearVietnam to launch
Operation VULTURE, using of A-bombs against Viet Minh forces. The Strategic
Air Command BASIC PLAN will use 735 bombers to attack the U.S.S.R. and China
using 1750 A-bombs. AT ISSUE IN CRISIS: "A-Day", the last day on which the
U.S.A. could launch a nuclear attack on U.S.S.R. without fear of a response,
is the probably the real issue, with the threatened fall of the Vietnam
"domino" only a pretext.
BACKGROUND:
In WW-II th e Japanese easily captured the French colony ofVietnam, and the
only opposition was from the Communist Viet Minh under Ho Chi Minh. In 1945
Japanese surrendered Vietnam to the British, and the French resumed control,
but the Viet Minh opposed the return of their run-away colonial masters.
France waged a long, failing war against Viet Minh guerrillas. In January
1954 French established a key base at Dien Bien Phu, deep in Vietnam, but
the Viet Minh "did the impossible" and brought in heavy artillery. CRIS IS
EVENTS:1954, March: DBP under siege with heavy Viet Minh shelling. - 8 Mar:
French General Ely in Washington asks for U.S. help. - 25 Mar: U.S. Army G3
Section proposes use of A-weapons in Vietnam. - 7 Apr: Eisenhower's "Domino
Theory": if Vietnam is lost, all Asia falls. - 10 Apr: President Eisenhower
sends Secretary of State Dulles and Admiral Radford to Europe to push
Operation VULTURE, which Prime Minister Churchill opposes (and disagrees
with the Domino Theory). - 23 Apr: French Foreign Minis ter Bidault refuses
Dulles' offer of 2 A-bombs.- 27 Apr: Dulles falsely hints to French that
Eden of U.K. supports VULTURE. - 30 Apr: Eisenhower to Cutler of NSC, "We
might give the French A-bombs." - 8 May: Viet Minh capture Dien Bien Phu. -
25 May: NSC and Admiral Radford advise A-bombing China if Chinese troops
support the Viet Minh drive on Hanoi. - 19 Jun: Eisenhower,"A-bombing China
means A-bombing the U.S.S.R. What would the U.S.A. do with destruction
extending from the Elbe to Vladivostock?"China does not intervene and the
crisis ends. OUTCOME: The U.S.A first became involved in Vietnam.

Nuclear Crisis # 6: 1954 NAME OF CRISIS: CHINA I (Quemoy and Matsu)
THREATENED USE OF N-WEAPONS BY: U.S.A. TARGET OF WEAPONS: China, U.S.S.R.
CRISIS STARTS: Sep 1954 CRISIS ENDS: 1 May 1955 DURATION: 8 months THREAT OF
NUCLEAR ATTACK: Stated AT ISSUE IN CRISIS: 1) Threatened end o f the U.S.
nuclear monopoly, sincenew Soviet Bear and Bison A-bombers now put the
U.S.A. with in range of attack; 2) communist control of China, a very
dangerous development.
BACKGROUND:
1935: Mao Tse-Tung and his communist guerrilla army arrived in North China
after the 6,000 mile Long March. Japanese aggression in China began again.
1935-45: Mao's guerrillas tied up large Japanese forces in North China and
offered the only effective resistance to the invaders. All U.S. aid,
however, went to Chiang K ai-Shek's forces holed up in Chungking and
avoiding battle.1945 August: Japan defeated and U.S.A. supplied Chiang's 4.3
million man army with arms, ammunition and air power for its anti-communist
drive. Mao's 1.2 million guerrillas controlled only the countryside of North
China, but Mao's forces had something that Chiang's far bigger and better
equipped army lacked: support from the peasants who had experienced the
brutality of their rule. 1949 Oct: Chiang Kai-shek and his armies were
defeated by Mao's arm ies anddriven into exile in Taiwan. Chiang fortified
two islands, Quemoy and Matsu, just 8 miles from the coast of China as bases
for his re-conquest of China. Chiang provoked China on two occasions by
moving large numbers of troops to these the islands, and both times the
U.S.A. went to the nuclear brink in support of Chiang's provocations. 1953,
2 Feb: President Eisenhower ordered the U.S. Navy no longer to prevent
Chiang's forces on Taiwan from attacking mainland China. CRISIS EVENTS: 1954
Aug: Chiang moves 58,000 troops to Quemoy and 15,000 to Matsu.- Sep: China
begins shelling the islands. - 12 Sep: Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) recommend
A-bombing China. - 23 Nov: China sentences 13 U.S. airmen, shot down over
China during the Korean War; again the JCS call for nuclear strikes against
China. (Note that this marks the 6th time in 1954 that almost the entire
U.S. leadership, the JCS and NSC, called for nuclear war: VIETNAM Crisis #5,
three times; May, in response to Soviet bomb tests; Quemoy and Matsu;
Airmen's Trials.) 1955, 15 Feb: Churchill advises against U.S. atomic
defence of Quemoy & Matsu. - 10 Mar: Secretary of State Dulles at a National
Security Council (NSC) meeting states that U.S. people and the world have to
be prepared for probable U.S.atomic war against China. - 15 Mar: Dulles
states that U.S.A. is seriously considering use of A-weapons in Quemoy and
Matsu area. - 16 Mar: President Eisenhower, "A-bombs can be used as you
would use a bullet." This sparks Inter national uproar . NATO foreign
ministers oppose atomic attack on China. - 25 Mar: Admiral Carney, "The
President is planning to destroy Red China's military potential." He
predicts war on April 15. - 23 Apr: China says at Afro-Asian Conference
ready to negotiate on Taiwan. - 1 May: Shelling of Quemoy and Matsu ceases,
and the crisis ends. - 1 Aug: China releases 11 U.S. airmen. OUTCOME: 1)
Chiang, having almost provoked war between U.S.A. and China, will use this
gambit again, with no effect ive U.S. moves made to preventthis; 2) crude
provocations by Chiang (and his U.S. allies) brought China close to atomic
destruction and China certainly remembers these events.

Nuclear Crisis # 7 YEAR: 1956 NAME OF CRISIS: SUEZ
THREATENED USE OF N-WEAPONS BY: U.S.S.R and then U.S.A. TARGET OF WEAPONS:
London, Paris (also U.S.A. and U.S.S.R.) CRISIS STARTS: 29 Oct 1956, Israel
invades Egypt CRISIS ENDS: 6 Nov, Britain and France obey U.N.
ceasefire.DURATION: 7 days THREAT OF NUCLEAR ATTACK : Stated AT ISSUE IN
CRISIS: Egypt's right to control the Suez Canal; Britain and France see
Egyptian control as a threat to their oil supply.
BACKGROUND:
1868: Suez Canal concession granted to France by Egypt's Turkish rulers.
1859-69: Canal built by a French company. 1875: Britain bought a major
interest in the Canal. 1882: Britain occupied Egypt and remains in effective
c ontrol until 1956. 1936: Britain signed a treaty agreeing to withdraw
forces by 1956. 1954: Colonel Nasser became President of a strongly
nationalistic Egypt. 1956: last British forces left their bases on the
Canal. - 19 Jul: U.S.A. withdrew financing from the plan to build Aswan
Dam. - 26 Jul: President Nasser of Egypt announced Suez Canal
nationalized. - 10 Aug: Joint British-French military planning to attack
Egypt began. - 2 Sep: President Eisenhower to Prime Minister
Eden,"..American public opinio n flatly rejects the thought of using force."
(The U.S.A. then imported only 4% of its oil from Middle East, compared to
Europe's 75%) With an approaching U.S. Presidential election, Eisenhower
wanted no crises. - 14 Oct: French and British planned at Chequers to invite
an Israeli attack on Egypt as a pretext for their seizure of the Canal.
CRISIS EVENTS: 1956, 29 Oct: Israel invades Sinai and advances to the Suez
Canal; Britain and France demand a ceasefire. - 30 Oct: U.S.A. in the U.N.
Security Council leads the attack against this invasion to the dismay of
France, Britain and Israel. Britain demands that Egypt allow British forces
to re-occupy Canal Zone. - 5 Nov: Egypt's refusal is then used as a pretext
for the seizure of Port Said by British and French troops, as planned.
Khruschev makes crude threats to, ".use force to crush the aggressors" and
hints that London and Paris might suffer atomic attack. This evokes a U.S.
counterthreat that any Soviet attack will be met by a U.S. nuclear
response. - 6 Nov: Britain and France agree to the U.N. demand for a
ceasefire. OUTCOME: A strategic disaster for the West in the Middle East: 1)
the Suez Canal was blocked and Europe's oil cut off; 2) Soviet influence
rapidly expanded in the Middle East; 3) U.S.A showed that it would not back
imperial adventures by U.K. and France; 4) U.S.A. was now master of Western
strategy.

Nuclear Crisis # 8 YEAR: 1958 NAME OF CRISIS: CHINA II (Quemoy and Matsu)
THRE ATENED USE OF N-WEAPONS BY: U.S.A.TARGET OF WEAPONS: China, U.S.S.R.
CRISIS STARTED: 24 Aug 1958, China shells Quemoy and Matsu CRISIS ENDED: Oct
1958, shelling ends DURATION: 2 months THREAT OF NUCLEAR ATTACK: Stated;
U.S. 7th fleet off Chinese coast. AT ISSUE IN CRISIS: Chiang Kai Shek's
right to mobilize armies on the islands, 8 miles from the coast of Ch ina,
with the permission of the U.S.A.
BACKGROUND:
(see Crisis #6, CHINA I) In August 1958, Chiang Kai-Shek moved 100,000
troops to Quemo and Matsu. This was over one third of his army.
Nuclear-capable U.S. howitzers were moved to Quemoy Island. CRISIS EVENTS:
1958, 24 Aug: China begins shelling Quemoy and Matsu. - 6 Sep: U.S.A. learns
Chinese Premier Chou en Lai ready to negotiate. General Twining of Joint
Chiefs of Staff (JCS) nevertheless asks President Eisenhower to give U.S 7th
Fleet Commander aut hority to order nuclear strikes against China, but
Eisenhower refuses. - 7 Sep: Soviets inform Eisenhower that in the event of
a U.S. nuclear attack they will come to China's aid. - 11 Sep: Eisenhower on
TV presents the "Domino Theory" of the crisis, but the U.S. public reaction
shows very strong opposition to this risky policy. Eisenhower to Dulles, "As
much as two thirds of the world and half of U.S. public opinion opposes the
course which we have been following." - 19 Sep: Soviet s repeat their
warning of 7 September, and shortly after Secretary of Defence Neil McElroy
suggests to Eisenhower that Chiang Kai-Shek be assassinated and replaced.
But Eisenhower rejects this plan, and a face-saving formula is worked out
with China: they may shell Quemoy and Matsu on odd dates of the month and
Chiang's troops will re-supply on even dates(!) This eventually leads to a
ceasefire and the end of the crisis. OUTCOME: 1) first time a large section
of the U.S. public denied Washingto nits support in a nuclear crisis; 2)
losing U.S. support, Chiang ended his crude provocations.

Nuclear Crisis # 9 YEAR: 1959 NAME OF CRISIS: BERLIN II
THREATENED USE OF N-WEAPONS BY: U.S.A. TARGET OF WEAPONS: U.S.S.R. CRISIS
STARTS: Nov 1958 CRISIS ENDS: 20 Mar(?) 1959 DURATION: 4 months?1;2c THREAT
OF NUCLEAR ATTACK: Stated AT ISSUE IN CRISIS: Status of Berlin
BACKGROUND:
1954, 2 Oct: Wester n European Union agreement signed by France, Britain,
U.S.A. and West Germany provided for West German re-armament. The Soviets
who had paid such a heavy price to defeat Germany (one Russian in 7 killed)
saw this as a major threat and provocation, also a breach of the Potsdam
agreement to "completely and finally abolish" German military stuctures of
all types. U.S. investment in West Berlin had turned it into the top
manufacturing city in West Germany. Each year 300,000 East Germans escaped
to the west via Berlin andfrom 1949-58, 3 million East Germans had escaped
this way. Western radio propaganda and spy operations used West Berlin as a
major base. Berlin remained a smouldering fuse to war. CRISIS EVENTS: 1958,
10 Nov: Khruschev proposes that control of Berlin be turned over to East
Germany in 6 months. The western allies rejected this since it meant
granting de facto recognition to East Germany. Post war agreements on Berlin
appear threatened and a new blockade of Berlin possible. 1959, 11 Mar: As K
hruschev's deadline approached Democrats urge Eisenhowerto mobilize. At
press conference he heatedly rejects this: "We are certainly not going to
fight a ground war in Europe." He refuses to escalate the crisis. - 15 Mar:
Air Force General Chief of Staff Thomas White's testimony to Senate is
released-- the Berlin crisis can lead to war with the Soviet Union and
"nuclear weapons may have to be used." - 20 Mar: Khruschev deny any rigid
deadline and the crisis subsides. OUTCOME: Khruschev and Eisenhower met at
Camp David, Maryland, in Sep 1959.Each wished a reasonable solution on
Berlin, but their moderate positions were heavily opposed by belligerent
Democrats in the U.S.A. and hard-liners in Moscow, with Mao in China calling
for wars of national liberation and accusing Khruschev of "appeasement". The
status of Berlin remained unclear and the situation dangerous.

Nuclear Crisis # 10 YEAR: 1961 NAME OF CRISIS: BERLIN III
THREATENED USE OF N-WEAPONS BY: U.S.A. and U.S.S.R. TARGET OF W EAPONS:
U.S.A. and U.S.S.R.CRISIS STARTS: 13 Ju 1961 CRISIS ENDS: 17 Oct 1961
DURATION: 4 months THREAT OF NUCLEAR ATTACK: Implied, war plan SIOP-62 with
3,423 Soviet targets and an atomic stockpile of 18,500. AT ISSUE IN CRISIS:
Status of Berlin.
BACKGROUND:
Germany, seen by the Weat as a NATO ally and by the Soviets as a foe
defeated at enormous cost, is now re-armed. Western presence inBerlin, deep
in East Germany was always a cold war trigger. Kennedy, a young President,
lacking Eisenhower's experience, skill and prestige, turned a problem into a
crisis by acting tough. His tough posture was helped by new intelligence
reports. During 1961 the U.S. Samos satellite sent the first sharp photos of
the Soviet Union. They showed that instead of having 200 missiles (CIA
estimate) the Soviets had FOUR! Also shown were the exact locations of all
190 Soviet strategic bombers. A disarming "firs t strike"by the U.S.A. was
therefore possible. This strengthened Kennedy's hand in the BERLIN III and
CUBAN crises. CRISIS EVENTS: 1961 Apr and Jun: Kennedy meets Kruschev in
Vienna over the ssue of Germany and Berlin with the possibility of new
blockade (see Berlin I, Cris #3), - 13 Jul: At NSC meeting Dean Acheson and
Lyndon Johnson call for, "proclamation of a national emergency over
Berlin." - 25 Jul: Kennedy on TV: "We cannot permit the Communists to drive
us out of Berlin by force." Boosts defence budget, calls up reserves and
enlarges civildefence measures (A-bomb shelters) - July: 30,000 refugees
flood into West Berlin from East in July. - 7 Aug: Khruschev on TV echoes
Kennedy's determination. - 13 Aug: Soviets seal Berlin crossings to
refugees. - 17 Aug: Construction of Berlin wall begins. Its intent was
unclear to Kennedy, who says that there is "one chance in five of a nuclear
exchange". Kennedy orders 1,500 U.S. troops to move by land through East
Germany to Berlin. They are u nopposed.- 24 Aug: Soviets accuse West of
flying "revanchists, extremists, saboteurs and spies" into Berlin. - 30 Aug:
Soviets resume nuclear testing. - Sep: a full scale, surprise nuclear attack
plan by U.S. B47 and B52 bombers is considered by Kennedy, McNamara, Maxwell
Taylor and Bundy. When McNamara probes Lord Mountbatten, chief of British
Defence staff, about this plan, Mountbatten says: "My God, anybody who
thinks of that is mad!" - 17 Oct: Khruschev at 22nd Party Congress says We
st understands German and Berlin issues and is willing to negotiate. The
crisis ends. OUTCOME: Berlin issue de-fused again. Kennedy and Khruschev's
improved contact is critical in the much more serious CUBA Crisis #11 of
1962.

Nuclear Crisis # 11 YEAR: 1962 NAME OF CRISIS: CUBA
THREATENED USE OF N-WEAPONS BY: U.S.A. and U.S.S.R. TARGET OF WEAPONS:
U.S.A. and U.S.S.R. CRISIS STARTS: 14 Oct 1962 (U-2 photos of missile bases)
CRISIS ENDS: 28 Oct 1962 (Khruschev will remove missiles)DURATION: 2 weeks
THREAT OF NUCLEAR ATTACK: Stated AT ISSUE IN CRISIS: 1) security of Cuba; 2)
security of U.S.A.; 3) right of U.S.S.R. to match U.S. medium range
nuclear-missile threat.
BACKGROUND:
17 Apr 1961, 1400 Cuban exiles invaded Cuba at Playa Giron (Bay of Pigs)
with U.S. support, but were defeated in two days. President Kennedy approved
Operation MONGOOSE: several attempts to kill Castro, sabotage, arson, crop
poisoning and murder of Cuban civilians, with target date for Cuban"revolt"
(with U.S. military support!) October 1962. To defend Cuba, Khruschev
offered Castro nuclear-armed missiles to be installed secretly. CRISIS
EVENTS: 14 Oct 1962: Kennedy gets U-2 photos of Soviet missile bases in
Cuba. - 17 Oct Wed: 16 missiles installed and would be ready to fire by Oct
24; JCS call for immediate attack; Gen. Le May, USAAF Chief of Staff tells
Kennedy an attack is essential and that Soviets will not respon d; Defence
Secretary McNamara and Robert Kennedy favour blockade; late at night Soviet
Ambassador Gromyko visits Kennedy, who does not confront him with the
missile evidence thus resulting in the dangerous public challenge and demand
for a humiliating withdrawal that Kennedy makes 2 days later; this also
excludes U.S. allies from consultation, and leads France later to quit
NATO. - 22 Oct Mon: Kennedy on TV reveals the crisis to Americans, but not
the U.S. provocations in Operation MONGOOSE. 42 medium-range nuclear
missiles are in Cuba already and 25 Soviet cargo ships heading for Cuba to
confront 180 U.S. navy ships, 68 aircraft squadrons and 8 aircraft carriers;
U.S. missile crews are on full alert, the B-52 bomber force is ordered into
the air fully loaded with nuclear weapons, and in Florida the largest
U.S.invasion force since WW-II is gathering. - 23 Oct Tue: Khruschev, "If
the U.S. navy interferes with Soviet ships, necessary measures will be
taken." Organization of America n States gives U.S.A. full support. - 24 Oct
Wed: Quarantine of Cuba goes into effect; Soviet ships approach the 500-mile
zone; U-2 photos taken 23 Oct show that the missiles will be ready in a few
days; navy reports Soviet subs active; twenty Soviet ships are stopped or
turned around, but 6 Soviet subs are approaching Cuba. - 26 Oct Fri: First
ship stopped and boarded (Marucla, Panamanian); Kennedy orders State
Department to prepare a post-invasion government for Cuba; at 6:00 pm
Khruschev info rms Kennedy, "Missiles in Cuba are defensive and will be
withdrawn if U.S.A. agrees not to invade Cuba and to recall its fleet. - 27
Oct Sat: A tougher Khruschev proposal: Missiles out and guarantees in Cuba
must be matched with the same for U.S. missiles in Turkey; JCS proposes air
strike on Monday followed by invasion; U-2 is shot down over Cuba by SAM;
JCS insist that the SAM sitesbe bombed on Sunday, but Kennedy decides to
agree to Khruschev's Friday proposal. - 28 Oct Sun: Khruschev replies at
10:00 a.m., "Missiles will be withdrawn." OUTCOME: Cuba secured from U.S.
covert attacks and invasion. Kennedy and Khruschev each almost lost control
of the military forces they had set in motion during this crisis.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

PERIOD 3 1962-1969 SCARED STRAIGHT

The Cuban missile crisis brought the world to the brink of nuclear war. It
was not only the worst crisis to date but was also the worst crisis
experience. It brought the reality of nuclear war home to the public and to
the two superpower leaders. It scared them straight. The Test Ban Treaty,
banning atmospheric nuclear tests, was signed by Kennedy and Khruschev on 4
August 1963. An opportunity for further improved relations between the
leaders of the superpowers was ended 3 months later by Kennedy's
assassination on 22 November 1963. Khruschev was ousted 11 months later on
15 October 1964, the day before China exploded her first atomic bomb. The
Vietnam War became a major U.S. involvement following the "Gulf of Tonkin
incident", 7 August 1964. The opportunity for improved superpower relations
and nuclear arms control and reductions, faded during the eight years of the
Scared Straight period as the Vietnam War escalated and the development of
nuclear weapons and their delivery systems accelerated steadily. The
terminal event of this crisis-free seven year period came with Crisis # 12,
VIETNAM II, caused by Operation DUCKHOOK, Nixon's secret plan to end the
Vietnam war by threatening the use of nuclear weapons.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
PERIOD 4 1969-1985 RELENTLESS ARMS RACE

The 1969 Decision by Nixon administration to MIRV the U.S. ICBMs, i.e., to
place multiple independently targetable re-entry vehicles, or warheads, on
the U.S. intercontinental ballistic missiles, resulted in a serious
escalation of the arms race. It meant that one ICBM "bus" could now carry as
many as 14 warhead "passengers," each of which could be dir ected to its own
target. A submarine with 24 Trident MIRVd missiles could thus hit 336
targets. Warhead accuracy improved greatly also and the possibility of a
"First Strike" surprise attack that could knock out all of the enemy's
delivery systems seemed within reach. These developments culminated in
Crisis # 16, FIRST STRIKE, 1 December 1983 - 19 November 1985, the most
dangerous period in human history.

Nuclear Crisis # 12 YEAR: 1969 NAME OF CRISIS: VIETNAM II
THREATENED USE OF N-W EAPONS BY: U.S.A.TARGET OF WEAPONS: Vietnam and
U.S.S.R. CRISIS STARTS: 4 Aug 1969 (Kissinger in negotiations with
Vietnamese implies a nuclear threat) CRISIS ENDS: 29 Oct 1969 (the DEFCON 1
threat fails) DURATION: 87 days THREAT OF NUCLEAR ATTACK: Implied (very
strongly) AT ISSUE IN CRISIS: U.S.A. failure to conquer Vietnam
BACKGROUND:
Nixon was elected President in 1968 partly asa result of his claim to have
"a secret plan to end the Vietnam War." His secret plan (DUCKHOOK) was to
escalate the war and use nuclear weapons if other measures failed. CRISIS
EVENTS: 1964, Aug: Kissinger meets Vietnamese in Paris, "If no progress by 1
November, U.S.A. will take measures of the gravest consequence." - 1 Oct:
Strategic Air Command (SAC) is put on DEFCON 1, the "maximum force
readiness" for nuclear war; nuclear-armed B-52 bombers circle and Minuteman
missiles are put in the highest state of readiness since the CUBA Crisis
#11. The clear message to the Soviets is to get North Vietnam to halt
operations in South Vietnam. - 13 Oct: William Watts (NSC) to Kissinger,
"Use of nuclear weapons on North Vietnam could throw U.S.A. into turmoil,
and need for widespread mobilization of the National Guard and U.S. Army
could ensue." - 14 Oct: President Nixon, "On October 14, I knew for sure
that my ultimatum had failed. A quarter of a million people came to
Washington for t he October 15 Moratorium (protest)." - 29 Oct: North
Vietnam does not yield; DEFCON 1 ends after 29 days (the B-52 bombers badly
needed servicing, apart from other considerations) OUTCOME: 1) A clear
defeat by Vietnam for Escalation Dominance theory; 2) A mea sure of the
power of massive public protests.

Nuclear Crisis # 13 YEAR: 1970 NAME OF CRISIS: JORDAN
THREATENED USE OF N-WEAPONS BY: U.S.A. TARGET OF WEAPONS: U.S.S.R. CRISIS
STARTS: 15 Sept 1970 ˙CRISIS ENDS: 30 Sept 1970DURATION: 2 weeks THREAT OF
NUCLEAR ATTACK: Implied AT ISSUE IN CRISIS: Control of Jordan BACKGROUND:
Jordan, a strategic pro-western Arab state was threatened by the pro-Soviet
Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) CRISIS EVENTS: 1970, 15 Sep: King
Hussein of Jordan orders his 50,000 man army to destroy the strong PLO bases
in Jordan. The possibility of a PLO victory in this strategic Middle East
country prompts U.S. s upport.- 17 Sep: Amman, capital of Jordan scene of
heavy fighting; to keep the Soviets out of the crisis Nixon sends 2 aircraft
carrier task forces with 14 destroyers , 1 cruiser, 140 aircraft, 1,200
marines to the East Mediterannean, 3 Army parachute batallions in Europe are
mobilized, and the 82nd Airborne Division in Fort Bragg, NC is put on full
alert; Kissinger orders the U.S. military to send un-coded messages to make
the threat of nuclear armed force deployments very clear. OUTCOME: PLO
defeated in Jordan and there is no Soviet involvement.

Nuclear Crisis # 14 YEAR: 1973 NAME OF CRISIS: ISRAEL (Yom Kippur)
THREATENED USE OF N-WEAPONS BY: U.S.A. TARGET OF WEAPONS: U.S.S.R. CRISIS
STARTS: 6 Oct 1973 (Egypt and Syria attack Israel) CRISIS ENDS: 25 Oct 1973
DURATION: 19 days THREAT OF NUCLEAR ATTACK: Implied AT ISSUE IN CRISIS: 1)
Survival of U.S. ally Israel; 2) U.S. dependence, since 1967, on oil import
s, especially from the Middle East.
BACKGROUND:
U.N. troops had separated Israel and Egypt since SUEZ Crisis #7 of 1956; in
1967 Nasser demanded their removal, closed Israel's use of the gulf of Aqaba
and blockaded the port of Elat; Egypt, Syria and Iraq had been heavily armed
by the Soviets and now threatened Israel's survival; Israel attacked, and in
the 6-Day War, 5-11 June 1967, defeated Egypt, Syria, Jordan and Iraq and
seized Sinai, the Golan Heights, the Jordan West Bank and Jerusalem. Israel
had more than doubled its size at the expense of its neighbours,especially
Egypt. Egypt and Syria rearmed and prepared to recover their territory and
their national pride. CRISIS EVENTS: 1973, 6 Oct: Egypt and Syria make
surprise attack on Israel. - 20 Oct: Soviets meet Kissinger who promises
safety for the Third Army in return for Egyptian concessions. However,
Israel violates this ceasefire and maintains pressure on Third Army. - 24
Oct: U.S. intelligence reports all seven Soviet airborne divisions on a lert
for possible aid to Third Army; Brezhnev (to Kissinger) blames Israel for
ceasefire violations, repeats offer of joint U.S.-Soviet ceasefire
enforcement and warns that Soviets will act alone if any further act of bad
faith by U.S.A.; emergency meeting in Washington results in a DEFCON 3
alert. - 25 Oct: U.S. nuclear forces on alert; 50 B-52 strategic bombers fly
from Guam to U.S.A.; 15,000 troops of 82nd Airborne Div. mobilise; aircraft
carrier John F Kennedy leaves Gibraltar heading east. This escalation is
designed to be detected by the Soviets and result in U.S. dominance of the
situation, without arousing the U.S. public. However, by 7:00 a.m. U.S.
media reports war mobilization and speculation begins that Nixon is using a
crisis to escape the growing pressures of the Watergate scandal. However,
the crisis eases later that day: Israeli forces relax their pressure on the
Third Army and the Soviets drop their insistence on a joint peace-keeping
force. OUTCOME: Soviets soon aft er described U.S. response in this crisis
as"absurd" and U.S. speculations on Soviet intentions as "fantastic",
indicating that the use of Escalation Dominance by the U.S.A. in order to
have its way in any confrontation is a dangerous policy.

Nuclear Crisis # 15 YEAR: 1980 NAME OF CRISIS: IRAN II
THREATENED USE OF N-WEAPONS BY: U.S.A. TARGET OF WEAPONS: Iran, U.S.S.R.
CRISIS STARTS: 23 Jan 1980 (Carter's threatening speech) . CRISIS ENDS: June
(B-52 Arabian Sea flights end)DURATION: 6 months THREAT OF NUCLEAR ATTACK:
Implied AT ISSUE IN CRISIS: 1) U.S. loss of control over Iran as strategic
Cold War base and major oil producer; 2) Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and
possibility of a Soviet move into Iran.
BACKGROUND:
Growing U.S. oil assets in the Gulf had been protected by British forces
since 1919, but in the 1950s the U.S.A began to take over. 1951: Dr.
Mossadegh was elected to power in Iran and announced the nationalization of
the highly profitable British oil industry. 1953: Mossadegh was overthrown
by a C.I.A. coup directed by Allen Dulles who sent General H. Norman
Schwarzkopf (Senior) to supervise the job. Shah Pahlevi, backed by the
U.S.A., held power for the next 26 years. The U.S.A. made Iran its main
listening post on the Soviet southern border and its main military base in
the Gulf. All opposition was dealt with by the dreaded SAVAK secret police.
"Iran had the highest rate of death penalties in the world, no valid system
of civilian courts and a history of torture which is beyond belief", said
Martin Ennals, Sec.-General of Amnesty International. 1973: Coup in
Afghanistan by Mohammed Daud, with whom the Shah had good relations and he
sent the SAVAK into Afghanistan to root out communist opposition. The
Soviets were alarmed to see formerly neutral and stable Afghanistan moving
into the U.S. orbit alongside Turke y and Iran.1978: Coup in Afghanistan
puts Amin, a Marxist-Leninist in power. He ignored Soviet "advice" and tried
to push rapid reforms. He also made close contact with U.S.A. through U.S.
Ambassador Adolph Dubbs. 1979: 16 Jan, Shah fled from Iran after defeat by
the one power that he could not crush, the Moslem Mullahs led by Ayatollah
Khomeini. U.S.A. lost a highly strategic base and listening post on Soviet
border, and a world-class oil supplier, leaving no U.S. or Britis h base in
Gulf for the first time in 65 years. - Sep: Amin in Afghanistan survived
attempted coup. - 4 Nov: U.S. Embassy (in its 22 acre grounds) in Tehrun was
seized and 46 hostages taken. - Dec: Soviets invaded Afghanistan, Amin was
killed and Babrak Karmal installed as puppet ruler. A long inconclusive
guerrilla war started. CRISIS EVENTS: 1980 (Presidential election year), 23
Jan: President Carter in his State of the Union speech warns that any Soviet
move in the Gulf will be "repelled by military force." Defense Secretary
Brown refers to the possibility of nuclear war between U.S.A. and U.S.S.R. -
2 Feb: New York Times headline, "Study Says Soviet Move in Iran Might
Require U.S. Atom Arms," based on a leaked, "secret" Pentagon report. - Jan:
First of 12 B-52 flights over the Arabian Sea; these last 6 months. - 26
Feb:Pravda protests these "most extreme measures", which fan the flames in
the area and deny Soviet interest for invas ion of Iran.OUTCOME: On 22
September 1980, Iraq attacked Iran with the support, as revealed later, of
the U.S.A., Britain and U.S.S.R. (!) Over one million were killed in this
war, and no U.N. action was taken against Iraq's aggression, which suited
all the major powers for various reasons. Iran was undefeated and Islamic
Fundamentalism gained a powerful base. Confident of Western tolerance, Iraq
invaded Kuwait and triggered the Gulf War in 1991.

Nuclear Crisis # 16 YEAR: 1983 NAME OF CRISIS: FIRST STRIKE THREATENED USE
OF N-WEAPONS BY: U.S.A.
TARGET OF WEAPONS: U.S.S.R. CRISIS STARTS: 1 Dec 1983 (9 Pershing II sent to
W.Germany) CRISIS ENDS: 19 Nov 1985 (Gorbachev & Reagan meet Geneva)
DURATION: 2 years THREAT OF NUCLEAR ATTACK: Implied (at VERY great risk) AT
ISSUE IN CRISIS: U.S. preparation for FIRST STRIKE CAPABILITY
BACKGROUND:
In the nuclear arms race the U.S.A. had always held a 5 to 10-year lead over
the Soviet Union. In the 1980's a system for a FIRST STRIKE surprise attack
on the U.S.S.R. was nearly ready, comprising: 1) Decapitation, the flat
trajectory Pershing II missiles being extremely accurate and designed to
"decapitate" the Soviet leadership, with flight-time to Moscow from bases in
West Germany being only 6 minutes; 2) Counterforce, with the possibility by
the late 1980's of knocking out all known Soviet missiles on land and at sea
with MX and Trident-II missiles using the new very precise Navstar
guidancesystem; 3) Strategic Defence Initiative (SDI) or "Star Wars",
the"shield" designed to deal with the possibility that a few Soviet missiles
might survive the First Strike. These very threatening plans meant that a
world nuclear holocaust might result from a faulty Soviet radar warning,
since six minutes would give the Soviets grotesquely little time to analyse
U.S. intentions. The Soviets understood this threat very clearly, and in
1980, - 26 Oct: Soviet Premier Andropov stated that the Soviets would walk
out of the Geneva talks if deployment of Pershing II and Cruise missiles
began. - 15 Nov: First shipment of Tomahawk Cruise Missiles arrived in
Britain. - 30 Nov: West German parliament voted 286:226 to accept the first
shipment of 9 Pershing II missiles on German soil, in spite of
demonstrations by 400,000 Germans, during 1983, opposed to their deployment.
CRISIS EVENTS: 1980, 1 Dec: First Strike nuclear crisis begins with the
delivery to Ramsten air base near Mannheim, West Germany by U.S. C-5 Galaxy
transports of 9 Pershing II missiles, which are then transported to the U.S.
Army 56th Field Artillery Brigade base at Mutlangen. In Geneva the Soviet
negotiator Yuli Kvitsinsky walks out of the meeting with U.S. negotiator
Paul Nitze, ending the nuclear arms negotiations with no date set to
resume. - 8 Dec: Nuclear Winter, which would kill all survivors of a nuclear
war with o nly half of the U.S. and Soviet weapons used, was predicted in
joint statement by 4 U.S. and 4 Soviet scientists meeting in Washington.
1983-85: One Soviet Soviet response to the threat from the Pershing II and
nuclear-armed Cruise missiles is also to arm its submarines on patrol off
the U.S. East coast with flat trajectory missiles. This confrontation with
hair-trigger nuclear weapon systems makes this the most dangerous period in
human history! 1985, 11 Mar: Gorbachev elected General Secretary of the
Central Committee by a margin of one vote over Grishin, a hard liner who
would probably have escalated the arms race. This election may well prove to
have been a critical event in world history. - 15 Mar: Nuclear winter "that
would wipe out all life on earth .
is all the more reason to continue President Ronald Reagan's weapons
build-up", Richard Perle, U.S. Assistant Secretary of Defence. - July:
Soviets begin a Moratorium on nuclear weapon tests. - Nov 19 Gorbachev and
Reagan meet in Geneva and Cold War tensions ease progressively for the next
two years, ending FIRST STRIKE Crisis #16. OUTCOME: Intermediate Range
Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty was signed 8 Dec 1987 in Washington by
Presidents Gorbachev and Reagan, eliminating all medium- and short-range
nuclear weapons. This ended the worst crisis of all, and the end of Cold War
followed. ----------------------------

PERIOD 5 1985-1991 GORBACHEV ENDS THE COLD WAR

1985, March 11: Mikhail Gorbachev is elected General Secretary of the
Communist Party of the Soviet Union's Central Committee, beating his
hard-liner rival, Victor Grishin, by one vote. Gorbachev sets to work to end
the nuclear arms race and the Cold War in a series of bold and visionary
steps. - Jul: Gorbachev orders the cessation of Soviet nuclear tests, but
between July and December the U.S.A. tests 9 nuclear weapons.- Nov 19:
Gorbachev meets U.S. President Reagan at the Geneva Summit, and tensions
between U.S.A and U.S.S.R. begin to ease. 1986 "International Year of
Peace", with nuclear weapons tests during 1986: U.S.A.: 15 U.S.S.R.: 0 - Oct
11: At the Reykjavik Summit, Gorbachev offers 50% reduction in strategic
weapons and removal of all U.S. and Soviet medium-range missiles in Europe,
but Reagan, unprepared, flounders and refuses. 1987 , Feb:Soviets resume
nuclear tests after a 19 month halt.- Dec 8: Washington: Intermediate Range
Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty signed by Presidents Gorbachev and Reagan. It
will eliminate all medium and short range N-weapons. This marks the end of
the First Strike missile crisis and is a landm ark event in the approaching
end of the Cold War. 1989, Feb:Soviets complete their withdrawal from
Afghanistan. - Mar: U.S.S.R. Part of new congress chosen in free
elections. - Jun: Elections in Poland give So lidarity a majority.- Nov:
Berlin Wall is demolished. 1991, Jun:Yeltsin becomes President of Supreme
Soviet after the first free national elections. - Aug 19: Gorbachev toppled
in abortive coup by old guard communist hard-liners. Had they won, and they
nearly did, the nuclear-arms race could well have resumed its fatal
course. - Dec 8: Yeltsin meets with the leaders of the Ukraine and White
Russia and abolishes the U.S.S.R. (with no mandate to do this).

-PERIOD 6 1991- POST COLD WAR RE-GROUPING

Following the break-up of the Soviet Union, the United States has emerged as
the world's number one superpower. A dangerous conclusion is that the U.S.A.
"won the Cold War" with Ronald Reagan's weapons build-up, but Vladimir
Pozner's comments in the APPENDIX refute this. This period is similar to the
SCARED STRAIGHT period after the CUBA CRISIS #11. It provides a precious
opportunity for nuc lear disarmament. In 1996 Russia is in economicand
political turmoil, China is rapidly emerging as a world power, there are
still 36,000 nuclear weapons in the world, and the world situation is not
stable.The balanced reduction and total abolition of these weapons, on a
rigid schedule is a matter of great urgency; the present lull in great power
rivalry may not last long.

SOURCES
1) Truman, H.S. "Year of Decisions, Vol.1", " Years of Trial and Hope,
Vol.2", Garden City, Doubleday, 1955. 2) Eisenhower, Dwight D., "Mandate for
Change", Garden City, Doubleday, 1963. 3) Schlesinger, A.M. "A Thousand
Days", Cambridge, Houghton Mifflin, 1965. 4) Kennedy, Robert.E. "Thirteen
Days", McCall's Magazine, November 1968. 5) Lapp, Ralph E. "The Weapons
Culture", New York, Norton, 1968. 6) Ambrose, Stephen E., "Rise to
Globalism: American Foreign Policy, 1938-1980", Pelican History of the
U.S.A., Penguin, 1980. 7) Aldridge, R.C. "First Strike! The Pentagon's
Strategy for Nuclear War", Boston, South End Press, 1983. 8) Peterson,
Jeannie, ed. "The Aftermath: Human & Ecological Consequences of Nuclear
War", Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, New York, Pantheon, 1983. 9) Prins,
Gwynn ed. "Defended to Death: A Study of the Nuclear Arms Race From the
Cambridge University Disarmament Seminar", Harmondsworth, U.K., Penguin,
1983. 10) Kaku, Michio, Axelrod, Daniel, "To Win a Nuclear War: The
Pentagon's Secret War Plans", Montreal, Black Rose, 1987. 11) Pozner,
Vladimir, "Eyewitness: A Personal Account of the Unravelling of the Soviet
Union", New York, Random House, 1992.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPENDIX:
pages 191-192 of SOURCE 11) states: "American conservatives love to take
credit for the 'fall of communism'. It was all thanks to Ronald Reagan, they
will tell you, to his policy of getting tough with the Russkies, of
launching SDI, more commonly known as 'star wars' - that was what ended
thecommunist empire! What self serving stupidity; what a misleading,
self-indulging understanding of history. Just one vote, one single vote from
a hand up to a hand held down, would have changed the world. Ronald Reagan
and the entire American right wing had nothing to do with Grishin's loss to
Gorbachev. The men who then made up the Politburo- people like Gromyko and
Ustinov- had built their entire careers on not giving a hoot in hell what
the rest of the world thought. They were all hard liners in the worst sense
of the word. I think that had Grishin been elected, the United States and
the Soviet Union would have been at war within two or three years maximum.
Ronald Reagan's ticket to the White House had, among other things, been won
on his promise to get tough with the Russians. There are not a few people
who attribute the demise of communism (that is how they refer to the events
of Perestroika) to President Reagan's military build-up, to his forcing of
the Soviets into an arms race they could not match. What that argument
ignores are at least two things. First, that Reagan had nothing to do with
Gorbachev's becoming General Secretary - that should now be clear to the
reader. Second, that by the time Gorbachev was elected General Secretary,
Reagan had been in office for slightly more than one full term. During that
period he had more than fulfilled his 'get tough' promise. The net result
was that the relationship between the U.S.S.R. and the United States stood
at an all-time low. The danger of military conflict had increased and Soviet
defense production was up. Neither Brezhnev, Andropov nor Chernenko had
demonstrated the slightest inclination to back down. Victor Grishin and his
supporters were of the same ilk. There is no reason at all to believe that
they would have been more reasonable. Conversely, there is every reason to
think they would have pushed the nuclear button had they been backed into a
corner. We should all thank our lucky stars for Gorbachev's one-vote win.
Thank fate, thank whatever deity or superstition you believe in. But the one
group we should not thank is the American conservative establishment, which
had the stupidity and arrogance to think it could play chicken with its
Soviet counterparts and win." =============================

Subject: Cold War N-Crisis #16: FIRST STRIKE

Date: Thu, 22 Oct 1998 19:31:06 -0400 (EDT) From: David Morgan
<[log in to unmask]> Greetings fellow VANA members: Here is some additional
info on Crisis #16 FIRST STRIKE, which always seemed to me to be the Cold
War's longest, most dangerous and least recognized crisis of all. Best
wishes, David The Sunday Times (London), November 30 1997 Kremlin was poised
to launch nuclear strike by Nicholas Hellen Media Correspondent THE WORLD
came much closer to nuclear conflict in the final stages of the cold war
than was previously thought, according to evidence from former Soviet bloc
archives.
The Kremlin was so alarmed by Ronald Reagan's plans for the strategic
defence initiative - star wars - and his deployment of cruise missiles in
Europe during the early 1980s that it planned a pre-emptive nuclear strike
against Britain and other American allies.
Documents unearthed in former East German military archives reveal the depth
of Soviet paranoia at the hawkish stance of Reagan and Margaret Thatcher
during the early 1980s in the wake of Russian military success in
Afghanistan.
Among the papers are minutes from a meeting of the Warsaw Pact military
committee in April 1983 at which Soviet generals warned that there was a
real possibility of nuclear conflict. "They said they were heading for war,"
said Beatrice Heuser, a military historian from King's College, London, who
has seen the documents. "It had moved beyond cold war rhetoric." The minutes
are from a series of volumes called the War Diaries. The grey-bound
documents were so secret that East German generals interviewed by Heuser and
other researchers from King's College were not aware of their existence.
The evidence is expected to feature in a landmark documentary from the
makers of the 1970s series The World at War, the definitive small-screen
account of the second world war. Cold War is produced by Sir Jeremy Isaacs
and financed by Ted Turner, the billionaire founder of CNN. The researchers
from King's College are acting as consultants. It will be screened on the
BBC next autumn.
The television series has been in production for three years and draws on
eyewitness accounts from the Yalta conference of 1945 to the fall of the
Berlin Wall in November 1989. Interviewees include former American
presidents George Bush and Jimmy Carter. Isaacs hopes to secure the
co-operation of Baroness Thatcher.
Isaacs, whose stint as general director of the Royal Opera House ended amid
criticism this year, hopes to repeat his earlier success as a
programme-maker. Kenneth Branagh, the actor, is to emulate the stirring
narrative of the late Lord Olivier, who provided the voice-over for The
World at War.
The East German papers reveal how in November 1983, as peace protesters
broke into the Greenham Common military base where the Americans stationed
cruise missiles, the Soviet military was planning a possible strike. Barely
800 miles from London, aircraft capable of delivering nuclear strikes were
placed on standby at East German air bases. On November 9, KGB stations in
Europe were warned that American bases had been put on alert. The KGB
suspected that a Nato exercise, Able Archer 83, could be a full-scale
nuclear assault.
The cold war had reached boiling point. Before November, there had been
signs of mounting tension. In 1981, Leonid Brezhnev, then Soviet president,
put his intelligence services on an unprecedented state of alert because of
concern about star wars and inflamed anti-communist rhetoric in the West.
Fear on both sides reached new heights when Soviet air defence forces shot
down a Korean airliner, KAL-007, in September. Initially the KGB maintained
this was a western spy plane and ordered that all Soviet bases be secured
against imminent western attack. On September 8, Andrei Gromyko, the Soviet
foreign minister, warned: "The world situation is now slipping towards a
very dangerous situation." Few, until now, knew just how serious.
According to Heuser, Thatcher was warned by MI6 that the game of
brinkmanship in late 1983 risked a disastrous outcome.
The American deployment of cruise missiles was intended to give Nato the
opportunity of fighting a limited nuclear war in Europe, rather than risk an
immediate escalation to global destruction. But, according to Heuser, it was
interpreted in Moscow as evidence of a more belligerent strategy which
implied that the West believed it could win a nuclear exchange. In the
spring of 1984, Thatcher convinced Reagan that he had to defuse the crisis
and open meaningful talks with Moscow about arms limitation.
According to some historians, the real threat of war matched that of the
1962 Cuban missile crisis in which Nikita Khrushchev, the Soviet president,
ordered the deployment of 80 nuclear warheads on the island.
Professor Lawrence Freedman, professor of war studies at King's College,
said that the events of November 1983 would force a reinterpretation of the
true threat to global peace posed during the closing years of the cold war.
*******
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/europe/newsid_198000/198173.stm
Wednesday, October 21, 1998 BBC Online 'How I stopped nuclear war'
Allan Little reports: Fifteen years ago, a Russian army officer, detecting
an incoming missile strike, disobeyed procedure and reported a false alarm.
In so doing he saved the world from possible nuclear catastrophe.
But he did so at the cost of his health and his job.
Throughout the Cold War, the Soviet Union and the United States depended on
a system of Mutually Assured Destruction, or MAD, which was deemed to have
kept the peace in Europe for half a century.
Both superpowers kept arsenals containing thousands of nuclear warheads
targeted on enemy cities.
"Deterrence through the balance of terror", combined with computerised
surveillance and early warning systems, ensured that any attack would be
followed immediately by counterattack.
But MAD failed to take into account one dangerous possibility - computer
error.
On the night of 26 September 1983, Stanislav Petrov, a young army software
engineer, was on duty at a surveillance center near Moscow.
"Suddenly the screen in front of me turned bright red," said Petrov. "An
alarm went off. It was piercing, loud enough to raise a dead man from his
grave." "The computer showed that the Americans had launched a nuclear
strike against us." A second alarm followed, then a third. "I knew the
system could be at fault, so I reported this as a false alarm." 'A big risk'
Petrov's orders were to pass the information up the chain of command, to
then-General Secretary Yuri Andropov. Within minutes, a massive nuclear
counterattack would be launched.
Petrov's decision to disobey procedure was intuitive; "The thought crossed
my mind that maybe someone had really launched a strike against us. That
made it even harder to lift the receiver and say it was just a false alarm."
"I understood that I was taking a big risk." When the computer error was
reported, the army began a massive internal inquiry. But instead of being
commended for his courage and quick thinking, Petrov was blamed.
Once a promising, twice-decorated young officer, Petrov took early
retirement from the army and later suffered a nervous breakdown.
"I was made the scapegoat. That was our system, the old Soviet system, in
the old Soviet army." ///end ************************** * David Morgan, * *
240 Holyrood Road, * * North Vancouver, * * BC, V7N 2R5 CANADA * * Tel:
604-985-7147 * * Fax: 604-985-7147 * * <[log in to unmask]> *
**************************