CHOMSKY Archives

The philosophy, work & influences of Noam Chomsky

CHOMSKY@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Harry Veeder <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussions on the philosophy, work and influences of Noam Chomsky" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 9 May 1997 00:34:47 -0400
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (46 lines)
I sent this to another list. It elabourates my concept of democratic
banking.

Harry



---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 9 May 1997 00:20:27 -0400 (EDT)
From: Harry Veeder <[log in to unmask]>
To: POST-KEYNESIAN THOUGHT <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Individuals as "Personal mini-banks"


Greetings to all.

I'm new to this list. I have no formal training but I consider myself to
be an amateur economist with a special interest in the philosophy of
value, price and money.

Here is a political and economic strategy for ensuring everyone has
enough money for living (independent of employment income) and without
using taxes:

I believe it is both theoretically possible and politically essential
to view every individual as operators of their own personal mini-banks.
Each person would be able to cover their essential living costs by
being allowed to issue a finite number of "loans" per year to businesses in
return for their products and services.

My question is:

Are there any important theoretical and/or technical difficulties to
regulating an economy with hundreds of millions of banks instead of with
just hundreds banks?

Politically, it would help in the creation of a Open Society ( Re:
Sir Karl Popper)

I would like to hear your comments and criticisms. I'll be
be away from my computer until Sunday or Monady.

regards.

Harry Veeder

ATOM RSS1 RSS2