It is painfully clear that segments of the population are bitterly dis-
appointed that there will be no slaughter in Iraq.  They however are not
in general the ones who would have faced bullets and shells.
wcm
>
> << In spite of all the bleating about the murder by bombing of innocent Iraqi
>  civilians, there has been no bombing. Is this a disappointment?>>
>
> Since when was voicing opposition to violence in the face of a majority of
> blood hungry citizens, all media, and all government, considered "bleating" (i
> assume you mean going along with the crowd).  perhaps you meant the "bleating"
> of the lone Black Sheep among the hordes, i will take it that way at any rate.
>
> << Is Saddam not a murderous tyrant>>
> i must have missed the posts, not only on this list, but also on every human
> rights news servers, Iraqi watch, and A-infos, which stated the point of view
> that Saddam was NOT a murderous tyrant.  of course, it could be that YOU are
> just "bleating" what has been repeated time and again as a "rebuttal" to peace
> activists who never stated otherwise (that saddam IS a murderous tyrant).
>
> <<... with 20 million willing hostages who
>  permit themselves to be used this way?>>
>
> please re-read the above stupid sentence.....upon reflection do you see an
> inherent problem with the statement??  no?  okay then, could you please
> explain how a people who live under a "tyrant", people who are "hostages" have
> a right to "permit" anything??
>
>
> trina
>