CHOMSKY Archives

The philosophy, work & influences of Noam Chomsky

CHOMSKY@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
The philosophy, work & influences of Noam Chomsky
Date:
Sat, 21 Oct 2000 11:21:39 +0900
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
>[William Meecham wrote:]
>Metaphores seem popular; the below discussion verges on 'how
>many angels...' We are dealing here primarily with imperialism (US)
>and no amount of rhetoric can disguise it (remember the tortured positions
>of the politically correct during the Viet nam war).

Goodness me. You are a very obtuse fellow, William. Which post is the
above a response to? Actually, never mind.

As for this recurring reference to Vietnam. I'm sure you've got a good
heart, William, but you need to realise how offensive some of your pet
refrains are. To insinuate that it's possible to equate the Milosevic
regime's struggle to survive with the Vietnamese people's struggle to
survive in the 1960s/70s shows a bewildering ignorance of S.E.Asian
history. It is nothing less than a audacious insult to the millions of
victims of U.S. imperialism and U.S. sponsored fascism. Therefore I must
conclude that your understandable contempt for U.S. foreign policy so
consumes you that you have become utterly incapable of expressing
yourself on the matter. It's either that, or, if not - your concern for
victims-of-the-U.S.A. is a cynical pose, which serves to underpin your
simplistic predeliction for ludicrous retorts.

Sorry to be so candid. Funny/obtuse, I can handle. But just plain-silly
is irritating.

Cheers

Adrian

ATOM RSS1 RSS2