CELIAC Archives

Celiac/Coeliac Wheat/Gluten-Free List

CELIAC@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Date:
Wed, 17 May 1995 15:08:16 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
<<Disclaimer:  Verify this information before applying it to your situation.>>

I've had two done that way but now they use an endoscopy which believe me is
a lot less of a problem. The reason I was told the capsule method was used
as it was believed to get a representative sample it was necessary to get
further down the intestine. Now they feel the sample using the endoscope
gives a reliable sample. Getting the capsule which I thought was called a
"Crosby" capsule in the right location was a lot of fun which is why you
could not be sedated during the process.

>Leon Heller <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>>BTW, has anyone had a Carey's capsule investigation? I had to swallow
>>a steel thing about the size of a small egg with a very long plastic tube
>>attached. When this had gone from the stomach into the small intestine the
>>tube was pressurised with water at intervals, and a small cutter on the
>>capsule collected a biopsy of the gut lining. When they got the biopsies
>>they needed the doctor pulled the thing back up again. The first time they
>>did this the tube got a kink in it, so they had to try again a few days
>>later. I had to jump up and down for about half an hour to get the thing
>>down into the intestine. This was over 25 years ago, perhaps they don't
>>do this any more.

Bernie Mansbach                                 ~_0   _0
Scotia, NY                                     _ \<---\ < _
[log in to unmask]                       (*) /--- /-(*)
voice (518)393-3475
data/fax (518) 393-1307

ATOM RSS1 RSS2