Legal experts say it wouldn't have been illegal if he did, but it
wouldn't have much precedence:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12206491/from/RS.5/
On 7 Apr 2006, at 18:00, Linda Walker wrote:
Bush seems very good at covering his tracks but I have to have hope
so I am hopeful Americans wake up and that the Democrats in office
find their backbone.
At 12:14 PM 4/7/2006, you wrote:
> ...and in order for Congress to impeach Bush, the Democrats would need
> to be in control, which isn't likely unless some real bombshells come
> out of the Libby trial, which will be delayed until after the 2006
> elections, IMHO.=20
>
> Kendall=20
>
> An unreasonable man (but my wife says that's redundant!)
>
> The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one
> persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all
> progress depends on the unreasonable man.
>
> -George Bernard Shaw 1856-1950
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kathleen Salkin [mailto:[log in to unmask]]=20
> Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 3:43 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: article...
>
> I don't like him any more than you do, Anthony, and I would love to
> =20
> see him get impeached but to be scrupulously fair, I need to see =20
> evidence.
>
> I also think what they did to Bill Clinton was horrible and I think
> =20
> turnabout would be fair play, but I don't see it happening. He's
> too =20
> wily.
>
> Kat
>
> On 6 Apr 2006, at 18:39, Anthony Arnold wrote:
>
> I have given up on hope that Bush and Chaney are going to be
> removed, =20
> so we
> better live through the next 3 years and promise ourselves that the
> =20
> mistakes
> made won't be repeated. Being in a red state where majority =20
> appreciate what
> Bush and Chaney are doing for everyone of us, I'm just amazed that =20
> people
> aren't willing to smell the roses.
>
> Thanks,
> Anthony
> Visit my website at www.anthonyarnold.net
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cerebral Palsy List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On =20
> Behalf Of
> Kathleen Salkin
> Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 5:06 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: article...
>
> If this is true, this is shocking...but before going all half-cocked,
> do consider the source. This guy is under criminal investigation and
> is probably naming names to cut a deal. Until I see an indictment
> for Bush come out, I'm going to be sceptical.
>
> I loathe Bush, but he is innocent until proven guilty.
>
> Kat
>
>
> On 6 Apr 2006, at 17:03, Mike Collis wrote:
>
> I was willing to give Bush the benefit of the doubt...
>
> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12187153/ but if this is true, it raises
> danger
> signals...
>
> -----------------------
>
> To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
>
> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=3Dc-palsy
>
> -----------------------
>
> To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
>
> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=3Dc-palsy
>
> -----------------------
>
> To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
>
> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=3Dc-palsy
>
> -----------------------
>
> To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
>
> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=3Dc-palsy
>
> -----------------------
>
> To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
>
> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=3Dc-palsy
-----------------------
To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
-----------------------
To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
|
