Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 4 Dec 2009 12:29:37 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
My brother-in-law, retired physicist for Lockheed-Martin when one day
several years ago in conversation we stumbled over the cost:quality:time
triangle... same as the good-fast-cheap... without a beat of hesitation
he said, and 'style'.
I have thought about that a whole lot since then. Triangles can provide
a too easy over-simplification of complex issues.
Examples of style: the value of the story, the fun of the adventure, the
intangible value-added, the smile at the end.
I am convinced that an economic perspective that does not include style
is like... well, why bother?
Give me style or give me death? Because, quite frankly, without style we
are already walking dead.
][<en
--
**Please remember to trim posts, as requested in the Terms of Service**
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>
|
|
|