BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mark Sherman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mark Sherman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 25 May 1999 11:57:50 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (73 lines)
Ken,

If you remove the extraneous sieve sizes that are out of the sequence of
progressively smaller aperture as follows it all makes sense.  (check out
the changes I made below)  The % Retained is not cumulative, and you must
add the % retained at a given sieve size and all the % retained at the
larger (smaller number) sieve sizes above it to get the % Cumulative
Retained which when added to the % Passing should equal within decimal
points of 100%.  It is also important to use the correct sieve type whether
International, American, British, French or German.  The U.S. STD/ASTM E11
and the British BS 410 are very similar and easily confused.  You have U.S.
STD/ASTM E11 screens here since the British does not use a 50 mesh screen
but a 52 mesh instead.  I wouldn't split hairs with it though, the figures
are obviously rounded off to the nearest 5%.  And remember... keep your
finger off the scale when you are weighing it!
Happy screening.
Mark Sherman

>Sieve Size      % Passing       % Retained              % Cumulative
Retained
>4                       100                       0
0
>8                       100                       0
0
>16                        90                    10
10        (10+0)
>30                        70                    20
30        (20+10+0)
>50                        40                    30
60        (30+20+10+0)
>100                       15                    25
85        (25+30+20+10+0)
>200                         0                   15
100        (15+25+30+20+10+0)




-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Follett <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
<[log in to unmask]>
Date: May 25, 1999 8:51 AM
Subject: Sand Sieve Analysis


>Could someone please explain to me where, in the following sand sieve
>analysis that we have in one of our proejct specifications, the difference
in
>passing to retained goes? Should the passing & retained when added together
>equal 100%? If not, why not? I'm faced w/ a dilemma of not being able to
get
>this exact mix from our supplier and needing to understand what is intended
>in order to proceed.
>
>Sieve Size      % Passing       % Retained              Where?
>4                       100                       0
>8                       100                       0
>16                        90                    10
>30                        70                    20
>10
>50                        40                    30
>30
>100                       15                    25
>60
>200                         0                   15
>85
>
>
>Thanks,
>][<en Follett
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2