BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gabriel Orgrease <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
plz practice conservation of histo presto eye blinks <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 7 Feb 2008 14:17:06 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (45 lines)
Cuyler,

Your explanation makes perfect sense.
I like the rubber band too.

I like it when you get carried away.

][<en


Cuyler Page wrote:
>> They must have felt there was some force in that area that required a
> tensile treatment. What were they trying to hold together?
>
>
> Sorry, I got carried away.
>
> In distant historic times, when drawing that detail for brick veneer 
> walls, I assumed the designers thought they had to work against the 
> thin veneer bulging or bowing, not stretching.   There were always two 
> rods spaced well apart, not placed in the centre of the brick, as 
> though to work against flex.
>
> The detail was just like what we did all the time with concrete 
> block.   The recent grad guys I worked for at the beginning of life 
> here had little experience with brick until later when giant brick 
> became fashionable.
>
> On the other hand, I love your rubber band image for Ken's windowed wall.
>
>
> cp in mbc
> (mbc = modern brick crap)
> -- 
> To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
> uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
> <http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>
>
>

--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2