BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
The listserv where the buildings do the talking <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:34:06 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (76 lines)
Eric:

Short wave UV might be better than Purple Haze long wave UV.

I won't be able to come to NY for drinks, even fancy-pantsy like 
Hendrix, but French nonetheless, drinks.  Probably would have to ship 
the light anyway, considering the behavior of TSA.

Steve Stokowski
Stone Products Consultants

-----Original Message-----
From: Hammarberg, Eric <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Fri, Jun 11, 2010 12:12 am
Subject: Re: [BP] Fire Soot / Smoke Residue Testing

Steve, It wouldn’t be fun if it was easy!Are you serious, a blacklight? 
Like the one under my Jimi Hendrixposter?If so, you bring the lights 
and I’ll supply the Après Work refreshments! 


Eric Hammarberg
Vice President
Thornton Tomasetti
51 Madison Avenue
New York, NY  10010
T 917.661.7800  F 917.661.7801  
D 917.661.8160  
[log in to unmask]
www.ThorntonTomasetti.com From: The listserv wherethe buildings do the 
talking [mailto:[log in to unmask]] OnBehalf Of 
[log in to unmask]
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 12:03 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [BP] Fire Soot / Smoke Residue Testing

 In a message dated 6/10/2010 10:35:46 P.M. Eastern Daylight 
Time,[log in to unmask] writes:
Very interesting Steve. I “thought” petrography would be usefulbut my 
problem is that we don’t want to remove any stone and there is 
nodamaged area either. Eric:
 
Make it hard, will you?  And this is an exterior facadeexposed to the 
rain which might have already washed off any fire soot, or itcould be 
contaminated with diesel soot from city traffic.   
 
The surface could be sampled with tape, which would then beexamined.  
This wouldn't be as accurate as examining a chip sample of thestone, 
but might be adequate. The issues are that not all of the soot willbe 
transferred to the tape, and that the soot will be on the sticky side 
of thetape under the particles of dust, etc. that transfer to the 
tape. 
 
On the other hand, some soot is fluorescent, particularly ifsomething 
oily or resinous was burning.  Maybe we should just go up to thefacade 
at night with my high-power blacklight and look for 
streakpatterns above the window vent areas. 
 
Steve Stokowski
Stone Products Consultants
508-259-3536 (cell)

--
**Please remember to trim posts, as requested in the Terms of Service**

To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the 
uncoffee-ed, orto change your settings, go 
to:http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html

--
**Please remember to trim posts, as requested in the Terms of Service**

To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2