 
| Subject: | |
| From: | |
| Reply To: | This isn`t an orifice, it`s help with fluorescent lighting. |
| Date: | Sat, 3 Jan 2004 10:24:44 -0600 |
| Content-Type: | multipart/alternative |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Mr. Liberal,
Yes. Intimate, expressive, fluids, divorce. I've not observed fathers
being the first out of the gate to support unions, unless there are
threatening conditions. I'm being subtle again...its hard on you...I
don't care.
Ruth didn't actually go out and kill any varmints did she? Kitty will
take care of that!
-jc
On Jan 3, 2004, at 9:38 AM, [log in to unmask] wrote:
> In a message dated 1/3/2004 9:21:16 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> [log in to unmask] writes:
> John,
> There ain't much civil about unions of any kind.Are you referring to
> labor unions, pipe/plumbing unions, or marriages? They tend to get
> personal, noisy, messy and expensive. How so? Obviously the folks who
> want to
> participate in civil unions have not listened to their fathers.This I
> REALLY don't get. Some people just have to learn the hard way. No
> argument with this part.
>
> Now if these folks at the Rainbow are screwing up your skating ice and
> X-C ski trails with their damned four wheelers and snow mobiles, then
> I'd say its time assemble a mob and burn the damn place down!I have a
> feeling that the Rainbow folks are more likely to trample the snow
> with their Birkenstocks in the course of protesting against Ruth's
> killing varmints.
> Mr. Liberal
>
|
|
|
