BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David west <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
BP - Dwell time 5 minutes.
Date:
Fri, 7 May 1999 01:16:17 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
AGREED.

I think consolidants can be risky with delamination of argillaceous (clay matrix) sandstones.  They don't really address the fundamental mechanisms of decay.

I believe options really are limited to chopping off or replacing.

david west

>>> Ken Follett <[log in to unmask]> 7/05/99 13:09:18 >>>
John Mascaro wrote:

> I prefer to arrest the degradation of the stone with a consolidant and just Let
>
> It Be.

I was of the impression that consolidants are not effective in bridging the gaps
of delaminations in sandstones. Need input!

--
][<en Follett
SOS Gab & Eti -- http://www.geocities.com/~orgrease 
Bullamanka-Pinheads website
http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/CGI/wa.exe?A0=bullamanka-pinheads

ATOM RSS1 RSS2