BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lisa Sasser <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
BP - "The Cracked Monitor"
Date:
Mon, 30 Aug 1999 11:33:20 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
And then there are the five stages of ANY project (although they apply
particularly well in the case of government projects):

1. Initial enthusiasm
2. Subsequent disillusionment
3. Search for the guilty
4. Punishment of the innocent
5. Honors and awards for the non-participants

Lisa


-----Original Message-----
From:   Met History <[log in to unmask]>
Sent:   Monday, August 30, 1999 10:13 AM
To:     [log in to unmask]
Subject:        Re: failed building materials

 << File: TXT1.TXT >> In a message dated 08/26/1999 9:38:22 PM Eastern Daylight
Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

> must ask Met History about this - is it a reporting rule  that if the
>  building falls down you name contractor, if it wins a prize you mention the
>  architect?

My rule is:

1.  If someone does something really stupid, and thinks its great, they get
named.
2.   If someone "designs" something (not necessarily an architect) they get
named.
3.   If someone does something particularly laudable or surprising, they get
named.

Sign me,  Grey Lady

ATOM RSS1 RSS2