BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Healing Lime Mortar
From:
edison <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The fundamentally unclean listserv <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 21:29:42 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines) 
Ralph is right. The lower the modulus, the greater the ability to deform
under stress. Caulk is much much lower in modulus than mortar.

Edison Coatings, Inc.
M. P. Edison
President
3 Northwest Drive
Plainville, CT 06062
Phone: (860) 747-2220 or (800)697-8055
Fax: (860)747-2280 or (800) 697-8044
Internet: www.edisoncoatings.com
E-Mail: [log in to unmask]

---------- Original Message -----------
From: Ralph Walter <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 20:35:42 -0500
Subject: Re: Healing Lime Mortar

> In a message dated 1/3/2003 3:01:44 PM Eastern Standard Time,
>  [log in to unmask] writes:
>
> > I assume the modulus of elasticity is less with lime mortar
> > than it is with urethane sealant.
>
> BZZZZZTT! You lose. Other way around. Unless I've got it backwards
> again, but then I'm not Nick the Greek.
>
> Ralph
>
> --
> To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
> uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
> <http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>
------- End of Original Message -------

--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2